In all turbulent periods of revolutionary politics, whether the 1930s, 1970s, or today, the ability to project force on the streets to punish enemies is a valuable asset. For the Left today, Antifa is that force.
I have a minor disagreement with that assessment. First of all, ANtifa is only one force so to speak, of the Leftist alliance. The LA and Deep State have many more tactical and strategic assets for 2020. This is the "strategic reserve" I often mentioned online, mostly elsewhere. What you see is only the tip of the ice berg in terms of their overall strategic assets. The more they use them, the more they become ineffective, but if they don't use them, they still have them.
The 1% of battled hardened "civilian security" of the Cabal, 1% of world population, in underground cities, is more of a strategic concern.
Counter A: But that's just a conspiracy theory.
Y: I know people find it hard to believe because they have not seen the evidence as I have, but let's just go with "worst case scenarios" as a thought experiment. Sorta like Hussein Red Flag scenarios.
Let's assume, for the sake of intel analysis, that in 2008, President Barack Hussein Obama was a traitor or (Renegade). How does one interpret the events of 2008 to 2016 in relation to this red case scenario or pov? It will be very different than what the fake news produces, I can guarantee that.
Counter: Being so biased towards a worst case scenario can blind the analyst.
Y: True, but given that 99.99% of all analysis is built upon average or best case scenarios, it is critical to having the odd man out. THe one that refuses to go along with the consensus, because what if the consensus is wrong?
Counter: the consensus of Trump AMericans is that Hussein is problematic and that Deep State is treasonous.
Y: THat is only now when it is too late to counter them. Intel analysis is of much better effect for prevention than cures.
2 comments:
In all turbulent periods of revolutionary politics, whether the 1930s, 1970s, or today, the ability to project force on the streets to punish enemies is a valuable asset. For the Left today, Antifa is that force.
I have a minor disagreement with that assessment. First of all, ANtifa is only one force so to speak, of the Leftist alliance. The LA and Deep State have many more tactical and strategic assets for 2020. This is the "strategic reserve" I often mentioned online, mostly elsewhere. What you see is only the tip of the ice berg in terms of their overall strategic assets. The more they use them, the more they become ineffective, but if they don't use them, they still have them.
The 1% of battled hardened "civilian security" of the Cabal, 1% of world population, in underground cities, is more of a strategic concern.
Counter A: But that's just a conspiracy theory.
Y: I know people find it hard to believe because they have not seen the evidence as I have, but let's just go with "worst case scenarios" as a thought experiment. Sorta like Hussein Red Flag scenarios.
Let's assume, for the sake of intel analysis, that in 2008, President Barack Hussein Obama was a traitor or (Renegade). How does one interpret the events of 2008 to 2016 in relation to this red case scenario or pov? It will be very different than what the fake news produces, I can guarantee that.
Counter: Being so biased towards a worst case scenario can blind the analyst.
Y: True, but given that 99.99% of all analysis is built upon average or best case scenarios, it is critical to having the odd man out. THe one that refuses to go along with the consensus, because what if the consensus is wrong?
Counter: the consensus of Trump AMericans is that Hussein is problematic and that Deep State is treasonous.
Y: THat is only now when it is too late to counter them. Intel analysis is of much better effect for prevention than cures.
Post a Comment