A Hopeful Election Projection
Roads to Warsaw
Neuromancer 2026
"I'm not Wintermute now.""So what are you." He drank from the flask, feeling nothing."I'm the matrix, Case."Case laughed. "Where's that get you?""Nowhere. Everywhere. I'm the sum total of the works, thewhole show.""That what 3Jane's mother wanted?""No. She couldn't imagine what I'd be like." The yellowsmile widened."So what's the score? How are things different? You runningthe world now? You God?""Things aren't different. Things are things.""But what do you do? You just there?" Case shrugged, putthe vodka and the shuriken down on the cabinet and lit aYeheyuan."I talk to my own kind.""But you're the whole thing. Talk to yourself?""There's others. I found one already. Series of transmissionsrecorded over a period of eight years, in the nineteen-seventies.'Til there was me, natch, there was nobody to know, nobodyto answer.""From where?""Centauri system.""Oh," Case said. "Yeah?"
It's an interesting time to be alive.
A Flaw in the Model
My mother, a career educator, has become one of those elderly Facebook ladies who posts what they take to be well-meaning things that would make me want to pull out my hair if I had any. I do not argue with her posts, which would seem churlish and lacking in filial piety, and you never win by arguing on social media in any case. The other day, for example, she posted a meme to the effect of, "If I hear that a woman was arrested for stealing diapers, I don't want to see her prosecuted. I want to know if she also need formula." It sounds nice, and I can understand the generous spirit intended, but... well, I don't have to explain to any of you what problems lie there.
Fall Color: On High

Serbia Update
Fall Color: October 29
Comments Policy
Since we have been getting so many anonymous comments lately, I thought I should repost the comments policy. It's very old: in 2015 it was nine, so it must now be a teenager. Anonymous comments are allowed, but must be signed with some kind of pseudonym that you'll stick by so that we can keep everybody straight. It's hard to carry on a conversation with three different "Anonymous" at once, not being sure which one said what or if they're all the same guy.Anyway, here it is.Please be welcome, so long as you will adhere to this form.I adopted [this policy] from the sadly-defunct Texas Mercury, a fringe publication but one whose bold assertion of well considered and unusual ideas I always enjoyed:As we see it, modern society has all the important ideas of life exactly backwards: we are completely against the belief in sensitivity and tolerance in politics and raffish disregard in private life. The Texas Mercury is founded on the opposite principles- our idea is of tolerance and polite sensitivity in private life and ruthless truth in politics. Be nice to your neighbor. Be hell to his ideas.Comments failing to uphold those principles run the risk of being deleted without warning. In the year and some months since I adopted that as the policy here, I've added one additional point: hit-and-run comments, as well as anonymous comments, will generally be deleted. If you're a regular here, and willing to stand up and fight for what you believe, you can say pretty much anything that isn't a personal attack on a fellow reader. If you're just wandering through, or unwilling to leave your name (even a false name you'll stand by will do, e.g., "Grim"), pass on. This is a hall, and regular readers are honored guests not to be troubled by cowards.Fair enough? Well, fair or unfair, those are the rules.
The only thing that's been added since is that off-topic comments may be marked as SPAM, which will cause them to disappear from user's experience. I don't delete them, but I do sometimes so mark them because we've had some people over the years who proved it necessary.Try not to do anything that will make me add to this list. I liked it better when it was simpler.
Meanwhile in Afghanistan
donkey's mistake left 51 deadAccording to foreign media, worshippers inside a mosque in #Afghanistan were performing their prayers when a frightened donkey bolted and entered the mosque. Some angry worshippers opened fire on the donkey, killing it.The news reached the donkey's owner, who, enraged, rushed to the mosque, opened fire on the worshippers with a hail of bullets, and fled.Thirteen worshippers were killed inside the mosque.The remaining worshippers, enraged, launched an attack on the donkey owner's village using light and heavy weapons, killing 38 people, including 33 women.Ultimately, a donkey going to a mosque resulted in the deaths of 51 people.
Good News!
Jealous of Socialism?
Treason & Waging War
Having said that, I'd like to correct something I said on a Spaces where I commented that organizing with a foreign power to overthrow our government is "the very definition of treason."I did some legal research and that's not quite true.The federal law governing this is 18 U.S. Code § 2381, which reads as follows:"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."The question then becomes, what is an "enemy" that must be "adhere[d]" to in order for it to be treason?Like with most complex issues of law, there is not a 100% straightforward answer, but an 1863 SCOTUS case, U.S. v. Greathouse, suggests that an "enemy" in this context must be in an open state of armed conflict with the U.S. for a nation to be an "enemy."So, technically, the Color Revolution plotters are likely not legally committing "treason" unless they are coordinating with Iran, the only nation we are currently in armed conflict with. (And they may well be, who knows!)
To the contrary, both the statute and the Constitution's text on the subject contain the "or" operator. No foreign government and no foreign enemy is necessary for a behavior to constitute treason. Treason can be fully constituted by waging war against the United States.
Attempting any sort of revolution against the government is a species of warfighting, 'color' revolution or not. The attempt to supplant the government by revolution, however often they proclaim that they are devoted to nonviolent means, is a species of warfighting. There is no way the nonviolence will prove to be more than rhetorical, but even supposing it were possible -- say, perhaps, by enlisting an AI swarm that effectively but nonviolently disabled the existing government so you could swoop in and impose another -- you would have destroyed a government without the consent of the governed, and replaced it with one to which they did not consent.
Treason can be the right thing to do, and sometimes -- often! -- has been. It is a wager of battle, however, and losers of that wager pay with their lives. It should be undertaken only by those who honestly believe in it and are willing to gamble their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

















