Is it worse to use violent metaphors, or to use them badly?
"The Last Bullet.... [but] The Cartridge is Almost Empty."
So it's a squib? Better not to use it, then. Otherwise, this will happen:
The Gangster Government
Er, another one.
This is an interesting piece, one relevant to the argument against social contract theory as a source of political legitimacy. It has to do with a prison gang in southern California.
This is an interesting piece, one relevant to the argument against social contract theory as a source of political legitimacy. It has to do with a prison gang in southern California.
The Mexican Mafia is a fairly small prison gang (perhaps 150-300 made members) and it has significant operational control only within prisons in Southern California yet the Mexican Mafia is extremely powerful. In fact, the MM taxes hundreds of often larger Southern California street gangs at rates of 10-30% of revenues.
How does that work? It's essentially a protection racket, at first, but has reached the point that it is regulating drive-by shootings outside of the prison (whose numbers have declined since the MM asserted its control) and providing services to gangsters.
They certainly appear to enjoy the consent of the governed -- that is, the drug-dealing community -- more than has the de facto government of California! So the question becomes, is this a legitimate government of a sort? Don't answer too quickly: if we decided that it were the movement becomes an insurrection rather than simple crime, and the decks are cleared for a robust response by our own system.
That might be healthier than the bleed-over of paramilitary tactics into our police forces: we could employ peace officers where there is peace, and treat insurrections as insurrections. There's something to be said for keeping your mental categories accurate to the reality of the world you face.
Dyson on the Mind
Who is in charge here?
The European: That brings us back to the indeterminacy and complexity of the human mind. Can computers ever replace that?
Dyson: It could be. In, say, the 15th century, there was the archaic view that the human mind exists on one side of the spectrum and the mind of God on the other side, with nothing in between except maybe a few angels. But that is a very strange idea, since every other hierarchy in nature consists of many different layers. It think it is much more likely that there are others layers of mind, although they might not look like a desktop computer. People are already walking around—effectively participating in a vast distributed computation—doing what their iPhones tell them. And we’re generally quite happy with that domination.
The European: I am still skeptical whether a computer can be more than an extension to the human mind. It is hard to see how computers could emerge as creative and imaginative entities in the near future.The question becomes more interesting if you consider the degree to which subconscious decisions seem to inform our activities. Let's say a subconscious decision gets made by your brain: We shall have a cupcake. A few seconds later, you find yourself typing into your iPhone to ask where a bakery is nearby. The machine tells you, and off you go to buy and eat the cupcake. You probably have the sense that you did something consciously, but in fact your subconscious is conspiring with Google Maps to have you do something you shouldn't really be doing.
Dyson: We have to wait and see. But I am not sure whether computers are just tools. When you look at your iPhone to get directions, are you asking the phone where to go or is the phone telling you where to go?
We have always been subject to a certain amount of manipulation from the meat; now there is a kind of pincer movement between the meat and the metal. The development of conscious virtue will not be easier -- but all the more important -- in such an environment.
Probability
Answer this question:
Linda, 31, is a philosophy major who went to Berkeley. She is deeply concerned with social justice and discrimination and participated in antinuclear demonstrations. Which alternative is more likely: a) She is a bank teller; or b) She is a bank teller and an activist in the feminist movement?Discussion below the fold.
Grim Encounters "Occupy" Protester
He called out from his occupation -- actually, apparently they applied for a permit through Christmas or so -- to tell me that he liked my boots. He said they were "hardcore." Well, damn right they are: I had to pull them on this morning to catch two escaped horses.
Horses, like men, follow those who lead from the front -- especially if they seem likely to produce a reward at the journey's end. When your faithful dog is herding them along, though, there's always a chance they may decide to outpace you a bit on the trip, so steel-toed boots are not a bad idea.
Little Avalon, now a thousand pounds, pulled down her gate this morning with such ease that she didn't garner a scratch from it. She's going to be an interesting one. Fearless and curious, that young lady.
Horses, like men, follow those who lead from the front -- especially if they seem likely to produce a reward at the journey's end. When your faithful dog is herding them along, though, there's always a chance they may decide to outpace you a bit on the trip, so steel-toed boots are not a bad idea.
Little Avalon, now a thousand pounds, pulled down her gate this morning with such ease that she didn't garner a scratch from it. She's going to be an interesting one. Fearless and curious, that young lady.
Speaking of Iraq...
...I keep waiting to hear something from our friend Bill, who surely has some thoughts on all this. He said he wanted to be there when they turned out the lights, and with good luck, it seems he might be!
Instead, all we get are jokes about Scottish cattle. (In the comments to which, Bill has already given his comeback line: "Joke? *What* joke?")
Instead, all we get are jokes about Scottish cattle. (In the comments to which, Bill has already given his comeback line: "Joke? *What* joke?")
The Show at Freeman Field, 1945
There was more than one, actually. You may enjoy watching this video, complete with Big Band music, of airshows featuring captured Nazi aircraft at Freeman Field in Indiana.
The other big show that year was the Freeman Field Mutiny, a precursor of the Civil Rights Movement.
The other big show that year was the Freeman Field Mutiny, a precursor of the Civil Rights Movement.
Numerology
It's magic...
Does that unification have any real weight, or is it just for our convenience? Before you answer, think not of a table but of a person. They also have many parts, but a single consciousness; and though they may lose (and may replace) some parts, once that single conscious nature flees at death, what remains behind is not a man at all. It doesn't make sense to say that they aren't 'really' a person while they are alive; so that unifying force has undeniable power.
Mathematical truths are the canonical example of truths that we can have a priori. It's hard to imagine why you would have occasion to ponder mathematical truths without actually experiencing 'two sheep' or 'a circle,' but in theory you can work out all the details without having to have the actual experience. Certainly it is true that you can work out the systems without direct experience of every aspect of the system -- you can prove what the size of a right triangle will be by understandingthe length of the hypotenuse alone [Joseph W. provides veritable facts about the square of the hypotenuse in the comments -Grim], if you understand the geometric ratios involved. You needn't ever see a real triangle of that size.
We put so much certainty into these things that they even influence our ideas about what other universes must be like. Is it possible that there could be another universe in which the gravitational constant is different? It doesn't seem unreasonable; but it takes a lot more convincing to get someone to believe in a universe in which 2+2=5.
We have gained a great deal from this fascination with the power of numbers and their relationships, which sometimes produces an insight that proves -- perhaps most mysteriously of all -- to have widespread application in a world in which no object is really precisely geometric at all.
Cain’s “conception, gestation, and birth all occurred within” the year 1945 (his words in quotes).The thing about numerology that makes it so attractive -- to intelligent people especially -- is that all numbers share eerie relationships with each other. The ancient Greeks were completely fascinated with the relationship of one number to another, so much so that one of the most fundamental questions in ancient Greek metaphysics is whether the most important fact is that a thing is, or that it is one. What do you mean to say that a table is one thing? It has four legs (say), and a top in addition; it has both a shape and a color; it has a massive number of molecules; why do we unify all that into a single thing?
1945 was also when Reader’s Digest published a version of Austrian free-market economist Friedrich von Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom, one of Cain’s favorite books. (A few other fans of the book: Rick Perry and Glenn Beck.)
Assuming Cain does become the 45th President of these United States, he would be inaugurated in 2013, the same year he will be celebrating his 45th wedding anniversary.
On one of the last legs of a campaign trip Cain once took, he was traveling on Flight 1045 at an altitude of 45,000 feet.
And last but by no means least, it is hard to overlook the fact that Herman Cain’s now-famous 9-9-9 tax slogan, shares a special relationship to the number 45 — just slice it down the middle, add the two numbers together, and, voilà!, you have yourself a nine. (Proof: 4+5=9)
Does that unification have any real weight, or is it just for our convenience? Before you answer, think not of a table but of a person. They also have many parts, but a single consciousness; and though they may lose (and may replace) some parts, once that single conscious nature flees at death, what remains behind is not a man at all. It doesn't make sense to say that they aren't 'really' a person while they are alive; so that unifying force has undeniable power.
Mathematical truths are the canonical example of truths that we can have a priori. It's hard to imagine why you would have occasion to ponder mathematical truths without actually experiencing 'two sheep' or 'a circle,' but in theory you can work out all the details without having to have the actual experience. Certainly it is true that you can work out the systems without direct experience of every aspect of the system -- you can prove what the size of a right triangle will be by understanding
We put so much certainty into these things that they even influence our ideas about what other universes must be like. Is it possible that there could be another universe in which the gravitational constant is different? It doesn't seem unreasonable; but it takes a lot more convincing to get someone to believe in a universe in which 2+2=5.
We have gained a great deal from this fascination with the power of numbers and their relationships, which sometimes produces an insight that proves -- perhaps most mysteriously of all -- to have widespread application in a world in which no object is really precisely geometric at all.
The Baths at Yavneh-Yam
If you're going to defend a strongpoint against enemy forces you're going to need to deal with field hygiene. The Romans had that problem:
The Roman baths uncovered within the fortress, says Prof. Fischer, leave little doubt that in the 12th century, the fortress was still inhabited by Arabs rather than Christian crusaders.
“This is an outstanding and rare find,” he says, describing the baths as a scaled-down version of traditional Roman baths, heated by hot air circulating between double floors and pipes along the walls. The crusaders did not build these types of baths, and after the end of the Early Islamic period, they disappear altogether. “You don`t see these installations again until the revival of such techniques by modern technology during the 19th century,” explains Prof. Fischer. “This marked the finale of the use of a traditional Roman bath house in 12th century architecture.”
Most likely, the fortress played host to a changing roster of military captains and their men, installing the baths to provide these men with additional creature comforts. Although the baths themselves are largely destroyed now, researchers found large marble slabs that adorned the walls, and ascertained that the view from the baths overlooked the sea.Given the news of the Iraq pullout, I am of course given to thinking of the thousands of shower trailers that we built -- in the form of shipping containers with the appropriate hardware -- and hauled to the desert. We tried to take over existing structures -- Camp Victory was established in one of the most developed sites of Iraq, the Presidential grounds outside Baghdad where Saddam feasted the upper-crust of the Baath party. There was nothing in existing hardware that was adequate to the task of Multinational Forces - Iraq.
One wonders what, if anything, archaeologists will make of our short time there. Nothing, one assumes; the history before and the history to come will likely wipe out all trace of what we did to the physical culture of Iraq.
As for the moral and political culture, that is in their hands now. May God defend the right, as we have tried to do, according to our limited understanding and poor powers. Yet I have faith in the people of Iraq, whom I have known in small ways over the years. There are dark days to come, I do not doubt; but I trust that Fate, at the very last, shall be kind to that brave and long-suffering people. They have chosen to take their chances with their own hands, and that is a choice fit for a free man. Good fortune to them.
Ignis fatuus
Wikipedia tells me jack-o-lanterns traditionally were carved from turnips. Pumpkins became popular in the New World, being larger, easier to carve, and readily available on All Hallows Eve.This is my jackolantern this year. It's not strictly kosher to carve something other than a face, but there you are. Anyway, there's a little face at the bottom being carried by the bat.
The Jack of tradition was a no-good thief who managed to trap the Devil with a cross, sometimes in an apple tree and sometimes in his wallet. Jack agreed to let the Devil go only if he promised never to take Jack's soul. Jack was not eligible for Heaven, either, so when he died he was forced to wander the Earth with a never-dying ember that the Devil provided him from Hell. He carved a turnip into a lantern to carry the ember in, thus becoming Jack of the Lantern.
Here in South Texas you can't carve your pumpkin ahead of time and leave it outside for more than a day or so, or by Halloween it will have collapsed into goo. This one is staying in the AC, where it will entertain our dinner guests tomorrow night. We're cooking up a feast of Indian food for some restaurateurs we've met in town, so the pressure is on to produce spectacular food and clean the house up into a more respectable state. My husband, usually Mr. Bah Humbug about holiday preparations, surprised me by specially requesting a jackolantern for a centerpiece. Next he'll be openly admitting he likes my Christmas tree and proposing Easter Egg hunts. Well, maybe not that last one. He did enter a local contest last week, though, and took home a trophy for his alligator jambalaya. That's getting pretty sociable.
While We're On That Subject: Miserlou
Did you know the original for this one? It's from 1927.
More likely you know this one.
And most likely, you know this one.
Apropos of which, for those who have forgotten this -- we've done it before here -- there's this little song from 1939.
More likely you know this one.
And most likely, you know this one.
Apropos of which, for those who have forgotten this -- we've done it before here -- there's this little song from 1939.
Gunn, With Occasional Music
So, you folks from the '80s: Blues Brothers, or Spy Hunter?
Actually, it's from the '50s, originally by Henry Mancini.
You probably know the two songs he does here, too:
The Editor Replies
Deer sir:
Thank you for your letter, which it was our pleasure to reprint for the benefit of the community. On behalf of the staff at our paper, let me promise you that we greatly appreciated your insight. If you have more, please do share.
With all possible respect,
-The Editor
Thank you for your letter, which it was our pleasure to reprint for the benefit of the community. On behalf of the staff at our paper, let me promise you that we greatly appreciated your insight. If you have more, please do share.
With all possible respect,
-The Editor
Declaration on Principle
The British have chosen an amusing recreation for us.
By 4 July, America's founding fathers approved a simple document penned by Jefferson that enumerated their grievances and announced themselves a sovereign nation. Called the Declaration of Independence, it was a blow for freedom, a call to war, and the founding of a new empire.So a team of British lawyers came to debate the other night. Some American lawyers joined them in the discussion. Let us do the same. Here are their cases:
It was also totally illegitimate and illegal.
The American case for the Declaration
The Declaration is unquestionably "legal". Under basic principles of "Natural Law", government can only be by the consent of the people and there comes a point when allegiance is no longer required in face of tyranny. The legality of the Declaration and its validity is proven by subsequent independence movements which have been enforced by world opinion as right and just, based on the fundamental principles of equality and self-determination now reflected in the UN Charter.
The British case against it
The Declaration of Independence was not only illegal, but actually treasonable. There is no legal principle then or now to allow a group of citizens to establish their own laws because they want to. What if Texas decided today it wanted to secede from the Union? Lincoln made the case against secession and he was right. The Declaration of Independence itself, in the absence of any recognised legal basis, had to appeal to "natural law", an undefined concept, and to "self-evident truths", that is to say truths for which no evidence could be provided. The grievances listed in the Declaration were too trivial to justify secession. The main one - no taxation without representation - was no more than a wish on the part of the colonists, to avoid paying for the expense of protecting them against the French during seven years of arduous war and conflict.Well, we've just finished discussing the origin of rights and governments. Here is a case to which we might apply those principles. What say you?
Viking Boat Burial Found in Scotland
This is excellent news!
The five metre-long (16-foot) grave, thought to contain the remains of a high-status Viking, was discovered at a site estimated to be 1,000 years old.
The Viking was buried with an axe, a sword and a spear in a ship held together with 200 metal rivets.Archaeology being a slow study, we can expect details to come out over time. Keep an eye out!
First Photograph of New York, 1848
From a cool new site I just came across, called Retronaut.
Below is the explanation that accompanied this picture.
“This half-plate daguerreotype of a country estate is believed to have been made in Manhattan in October 1848 or earlier. The daguerreotype shows in the foreground what is almost certainly the old Bloomingdale Road, referred to as ‘a continuation of Broadway’ in the city directories of the day. In the deep well of the road, to the left, is a horse-drawn carriage with passengers that has come to a halt for the photographer.”
- Sothebys
There Stands a Piper
Jump about five minutes into this clip, and the piper lays down the Uilleann pipes, and picks up a set of Great Highland Warpipes. The piper's name is Neil Anderson, and he's by far the most talented piper I've ever seen. Twenty years ago, he used to do the Stone Games as a part of a band called Seven Nations. He was really that whole band, and when he left it, the thing turned into a shadow of itself. Lately he's been back to the Games with a new band called Rathkeltair.
Crank it up, and give him some of your time. You can try this one, too, which has "Atholl Highlanders" in it about halfway through:
Unfortunately, recording just doesn't capture the Warpipes in their glory. They fill the air like a thunderstorm. If you've heard them before, you'll have to do the rest with your imagination; if you haven't, you simply can't.
UPDATE:
Or try this one:
Again, skip halfway through to find the best part. Or don't, and watch the cinematography. The problem this band has got is that they think they've got a lead guitarist. They don't: what they have is a lead piper, who is carrying the band. Until they sort that out, they won't be able to break out to where they ought to be: and they ought to be great, for they have one of the masters of his generation.
Crank it up, and give him some of your time. You can try this one, too, which has "Atholl Highlanders" in it about halfway through:
Unfortunately, recording just doesn't capture the Warpipes in their glory. They fill the air like a thunderstorm. If you've heard them before, you'll have to do the rest with your imagination; if you haven't, you simply can't.
UPDATE:
Or try this one:
Again, skip halfway through to find the best part. Or don't, and watch the cinematography. The problem this band has got is that they think they've got a lead guitarist. They don't: what they have is a lead piper, who is carrying the band. Until they sort that out, they won't be able to break out to where they ought to be: and they ought to be great, for they have one of the masters of his generation.
How to Co-Opt a Protester
James Taranto is the master.
For a protest against business, Occupy Wall Street seems to be generating a lot of it. For one thing, it's a tourist attraction: We talked to a college girl visiting from Salt Lake City and a guy who had come up from Maryland. (He is photographer Ed Fagan, whose work accompanies this column and whose protest slide show can be viewed here. He is available for weddings and other occasions.)Maybe he can find out where we can hire some of those Guy-Fawkes-mask guys to cater our next birthday party.
What is Most Worthy
Having considered all these different forms of the practice of arms, it is now time to speak of the truest and most perfect form which exists and is to be found in a number of men-at-arms. It is embodied in those who, from their own nature and instinct, as soon as they begin to reach the age of understanding, and with their understanding they like to hear and listen to men of prowess talk of military deeds... and as they reach adulthood, the desire in their hearts grows ever greater to ride and to bear arms.
...
[They] cannot be satisfied with themselves if they do not realize to the full their wish to find themselves there and to learn. They want to observe and to find out how to set up an expedition to attack and fight one's enemies, and to observe the deployment of light horsemen, the deployment of men-at-arms and foot soldiers, and the best way to advance in a fine attack and to make a safe and honorable withdrawal.... the defense of castles and walled towns... still they are unsatisfied, for they always want to learn more because they hear about how one can lay siege to walled towns and castles.
-Geoffroi de CharnyGeoffroi de Charny was a Knight of the Order of the Star, who died with the sacred banner of France in his hand at the Battle of Poitiers in 1356. It would be on point to our recent discussions for me to quote his remarks on marriage and love, which are not dissimilar to his remarks on men-at-arms. He invariably says that 'we should praise most those who are most worthy,' exploring deficiencies and then perfections for men and for ladies, and for men and ladies together.
For now, though, I want to draw your attention to his remarks on the best kind of man. Notice how similar the knight's argument is to Aquinas' argument below. We begin with a natural drive which has as its end a good: the desire to ride and to bear arms, which defends the weak and upholds the just; or the desire to love, which brings children and joy. There are many ways to do each of these badly, and Aquinas and de Charny both speak at length about what is imperfect, and just why it is imperfect.
The goal, in both cases, is to perfect your nature. The road, in both cases, is through reason: "the age of understanding," "with his understanding," "to hear and to listen," "to learn," "to observe and find out." "They cannot be satisfied with themselves if they do not realize to the full their wish to find themselves there and to learn."
This last shows that the fullest and most perfect virtue is a virtue of deeds and not merely of understanding alone. It is not enough to know what is right, but you must also realize what is right through your actions -- for to "realize" is "to make real." This is the subcreation of which we have spoken: we are directed to make it exist.
This weekend at the Stone Games I spoke to many people who shared this drive, and taught on these subjects: how to defend and attack, and not just yourself but in formations; how walled cities were taken and how you could organize against infantry or cavalry, or with archers; and how these medieval tactics and strategies align with our modern ones, so that you might begin to see the military art in full. Many came who clearly shared this drive in their hearts, but to whom it was not given that they should be able to realize it fully in their actions. Some were crippled of limb, and a few of mind, but their hearts were likewise drawn to virtue. It is important to help them achieve it as far as they can. It is wise to remember that we also have limits and weaknesses, and fail to do what would be most perfect. It is therefore an honor to help those who would do more than they can do, as we hope to be forgiven for our limits or for our weakness, and to find help in achieving perfection.
We spoke very little of Aristotle, except for some of the Physics, but Aristotle is there present in all of this. Ever since the Spanish knights began to recapture the lands that had fallen to Islam, the commentaries of Averroes on Aristotle spread into the West and began to inform our understanding. De Charny is following his model, as informed by Aquinas and others.
Such is the path, which begins in your own nature and is perfected through understanding and deeds. Ride, and bear arms.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

