Here's a NYT editor whiffing a faint clue:
In other words, it’s not really about George Floyd or Black lives, but insurrection for insurrection’s sake.
HotAir regrets that we don't have a "Joker Award for Belatedly Discovering That Some People Want to Watch the World Burn":
[O]ne does have to ask why a major American media outlets didn’t connect these dots for itself. It’s been over four months since the start of these riots, and yet an editorial board member for one of the largest media outlets in the country just figured this out. And she only figured it out after reading [Jeremy Lee] Quinn’s blog rather than the work of the reporters she employs. What does that say about the New York Times and its ability to report the truth rather than regurgitate popular narratives?
I wonder who authorized her to start reading blogs with unapproved narratives, anyway? How secure is her job?
3 comments:
From the HotAir cited excerpt: What does that say about the New York Times and its ability to report the truth rather than regurgitate popular narratives?
What does it say about anyone who still considers the NYT anything other than a tabloid paper?
Eric Hines
Really good crossword, though.
You can buy targeted views or buy slow instagram likes. They also promote all things music.
Post a Comment