Everything that came out seemed to confirm the worst suspicions.
Her paranoid opponents said she was a part of the elite globalist cabal secretly plotting to impose one-world government by surrendering national sovereignty. And there she was, according to emails between her advisers hacked and released by Wikileaks, telling a Brazilian bank in 2013, “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.” She was paid $225,000 for the speech. (The campaign has not confirmed that the emails from the account of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta are authentic, but many of them have been corroborated by third parties.)
Her critics had long charged that she said whatever people wanted to hear, and there she was saying behind closed doors that when it comes to policymaking, “You need both a public and a private position.” They said she was a member of the out-of-touch elite, and there she was saying she was “kind of far removed” from regular people’s struggles. They said she was too cozy with wealthy donors, and there she was telling the CEO of Goldman Sachs that she feels sorry for rich people, because “there is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives.”
In a Democratic debate in April, Bernie Sanders charged that while he was introducing legislation to break up the banks that caused the financial crisis, “Secretary Clinton was busy giving speeches to Goldman Sachs for $225,000 a speech.” And sure enough, the hacked emails showed...
This goes on for quite a while. There's a very long list of ways in which her critics have been proven right about everything.
Still, she says: "The people who believe in Clinton are naive enough to think she might actually make things better."
But why would she use her power against these things, when these things are the very source of her power?
2 comments:
Those whom the gods destroy, they first make mad.
Although I'm tempted to also just go say 'go read The Screwtape Letters'.
Amen to Screwtape - though there are sections of The Great Divorce which might fit better.
To the OP. For those of us who lived through the late 90's, this is all familiar. You can't prove it, you can't prove it, you can't prove it, but when it is proven it is "old news." And soon after, it will be Move On, get over it.
Post a Comment