March 3 is the Texas primary. In my little county, the focus isn't on the presidential contest--a foregone conclusion in this deep-red community--or even on the state races, most of which are not realistically contested at the primary level, at least on the Republican side. The focus is on a handful of county races, which in this county are decided at the primary stage given the small local Democratic party's habit of not fielding any candidates. When November comes around, we almost never have any contested races for county positions.
This makes for a brief election season, kicked off in December with the filing deadline and finishing up in early March or, at the latest, in May with the run-offs. This spring it's all two-person races, so we'll be spared a run-off.
The big political event for us this year is that we have at long last a chance to express a view about our County Attorney, who also is our only prosecutor. In August 2017 she got into a feud with the police force for the county's only town of any size, which led her to boycott prosecuting any of their cases for years. Recently she's begun to prosecute a few, but given her tendency to announce "not ready for trial" repeatedly, then to dismiss cases, it's not meaning that much to us.
For reasons known only to herself, within the last couple of months she picked a fight with the Sheriff's office. Now, it was one thing to feud with the city police department, because the city officials, for some reason, are not really tied into the county's old-guard establishment. The Sheriff is another story. I don't know the guy well, but he seems to be a fairly regular guy with considerable integrity. Certainly he's got better credibility than the County Attorney--not that you couldn't say that of most people. Anyway, it looks as though she finally picked a fight she was unlikely to win. A week and a half ago she threatened to indict him, in public, at a large gathering. She's turned coy now and said she won't answer questions about it, because it would be improper to comment publicly on a potential indictment. That's rich considering the public nature of the threat.
I'm watching the whole thing with unusual interest. My interest is piqued in part because I really think we deserve a better prosecutor, and we went to a lot of trouble to line up a good challenger and unite behind her. It's also because there are a couple of good challengers for two seats on the 5-member Commissioners Court. My life on the court will be more pleasant if I have a couple of allies who will be reliable support on issues of transparency in government.
A fourth race is a peculiar one. Our soon-to-retire Tax Assessor-Collector has endorsed her chief deputy clerk as successor. Normally this would be a no-brainer for me, as I know nothing against either the current official or her designated successor. On the other hand, the successor is a perfectly ordinary bureaucrat, whereas a good friend chose to run against her on an eccentric and rather inspiring platform. He knows, of course, that the tax office is mostly ministerial and has next to no policy leeway. Nevertheless, he wants to follow a growing trend among Texas tax offices in pushing citizen education about tax and appraisal issues, especially in deciphering the appraisal protest and exemption processes.
I've been thinking about why his candidacy appeals to me so much, wondering if it's just because he's a friend. I think it's that he's a dedicated and thoughtful libertarian who puts endless effort into going door to door in every election trying to engage people in a very interesting political debate. There's an idealism there I don't see often. He has faith in people and doesn't fear rejection, even when rejection hurts.
I'm pretty sure what I'm connecting with is an echo of the old Borderlands Scots-Irish culture. If the Nazis were coming over the hill, this certainly would be the guy you wanted to stand with. Should he be running the tax office? Well, all I can say is I'd like to see more people like him in government. Citizens of courage are the only real bulwark between us and even the petty variety of tyranny.