Anyone in Florida?
If any of the regulars of the Hall are making plans to evacuate for the hurricane, shout out in the comments. I have plenty of friends, and some resources, in the state immediately to your north.
"The Dogma Lives Loudly In You"
...and that's a concern rather than kind of a nice compliment where Senator Feinstein comes from, apparently.
I know a few people who would have blushed with pleasure if she'd said that to them: "Aw, shucks, ma'am."
As Allahpundit points out, even raising this as a concern is dubiously constitutional. Making it a test for whether or not you'd vote for someone is certainly unconstitutional. But, of course, there was no danger of this Senator ever voting in favor of the nominee anyway, so it's not as if there was a 'test' she might have passed by having another religion (or a more dubious attachment to her current one).
I know a few people who would have blushed with pleasure if she'd said that to them: "Aw, shucks, ma'am."
As Allahpundit points out, even raising this as a concern is dubiously constitutional. Making it a test for whether or not you'd vote for someone is certainly unconstitutional. But, of course, there was no danger of this Senator ever voting in favor of the nominee anyway, so it's not as if there was a 'test' she might have passed by having another religion (or a more dubious attachment to her current one).
Viking Women in Scotland
An article from the Scotsman. The archaeologists cited state that Viking women in Scotland enjoyed higher status than elsewhere in the Norse world, based on an analysis of the number of women who received high-status burials. The archaeologist in question is still using the measure of 'gendered' grave goods to determine who is a male or a female, though, which we now know did not apply perfectly: at least some (though probably not the "half" that was reported) high-status women were buried with what our scientists have long taken to be 'male' grave goods. Thus, the real figure may be parity rather than 2-for-3 (and opposed to 1-for-25 on the Isle of Man).
Definitely 'Traditional'
A candidate for mayor in Charlotte, N.C., [wrote] "VOTE FOR ME!" on her Facebook page, the Charlotte Observer reported.I'm not sure about the other qualities she lists, but there certainly is a tradition there to which she can appeal.
"REPUBLICAN & SMART, WHITE, TRADITIONAL."
SPLC vs. DB
True story: Southern Poverty Law Center's 'hate' list led to a terrorist attack on the Family Research Council.
True story: SPLC decides that FGM-victim-who-fled-Europe-under-death-threats-from-radical-Islamic-assassins Ayaan Hirsi Ali needs to be added to that 'hate' list.
DB headline: "Southern Poverty Law Center classifies VFW and American Legion as hate groups."
True story: SPLC decides that FGM-victim-who-fled-Europe-under-death-threats-from-radical-Islamic-assassins Ayaan Hirsi Ali needs to be added to that 'hate' list.
DB headline: "Southern Poverty Law Center classifies VFW and American Legion as hate groups."
In a written statement signed by SPLC President J. Richard Cohen, the organization said both the VFW and Legion were included since many of their members sympathize with radical, extreme-right-wing ideals such as freedom, safety, and family values.It's all true.
“I hate to criminalize a group of decorated war veterans,” Cohen said... “But these people revere statues of soldiers who have fought in wars where minorities and women weren’t allowed to fight.”
According to the SPLC, members of the Legion and VFW are well-known for inciting extreme hatred against enemies of the United States, and for engaging in violent behavior. VFW members, for example, have been known to carry out shootings, stabbings, and bombings in countries around the world for more than 100 years.
Viking Sword Found in High Norway
This story reminds me of another recent such find, but I can't seem to locate it in the archives and the news stories about this all seem to be in the last few days (even the ones in Norsk). So in case this is a second such find, let me draw your attention to it. It's certainly a very nice looking piece.
Fallen hero
An electrical worker was just killed in a tiny town about halfway between Victoria and the coast, to our northeast. All these fine young men drove to us from all over the country to restore our grid. They've been working like dogs.
Hurricane vids
First one is a flyover. This starts far south of town. You can see the damage is extensive but not complete--until you get to the north end of town and the plane starts to circle up around the NW coast of Copano Bay. Those people got monkey-hammered. The plane stops there and doesn't cross Copano Bay to my community on the Lamar Peninsula, but I assure you it looks there more like the lightly damaged areas of Rockport. I've seen houses with roofs off on the water front, but fewer than you'd think, and hardly anything just exploded to pieces like what you see on NW Copano. Since no one was killed, I have to assume those houses were unoccupied.
This is impressive video from a hotel on the main drag in town. It was completed only about a year ago, but parts of it really came to pieces. Everyone inside was OK. You can see the incredible winds from one direction, then from the other. We didn't get to see much of that, it being dark and most of our windows being boarded up. We had only one door on the lee side with accessible windows, and closed even that shutter as we approached the peak. I had a better video from the same spot with time tags in it, but now I can't find it.
This is a satellite video as the eye nears landfall on us. The kidney-shaped bay with a narrow neck is us: we're on the little peninsula on the NE side. The video stops as the sun sets, a couple of hours before the eyewall struck.
We continue to chip away at the neighborhood's needs. All seems to be going pretty well.
This is impressive video from a hotel on the main drag in town. It was completed only about a year ago, but parts of it really came to pieces. Everyone inside was OK. You can see the incredible winds from one direction, then from the other. We didn't get to see much of that, it being dark and most of our windows being boarded up. We had only one door on the lee side with accessible windows, and closed even that shutter as we approached the peak. I had a better video from the same spot with time tags in it, but now I can't find it.
This is a satellite video as the eye nears landfall on us. The kidney-shaped bay with a narrow neck is us: we're on the little peninsula on the NE side. The video stops as the sun sets, a couple of hours before the eyewall struck.
We continue to chip away at the neighborhood's needs. All seems to be going pretty well.
A Social History of Manure
There's actually some interesting stuff in this study of medieval farming practices, but the desire on the part of the authors to turn it into a Marxist social critique is laughable.
These [manure spreading techniques] were not mute, but conveyed messages from the ground... ‘…soil and land texture are important referents for social expression. Particular textures were understood and used not just for their functional attributes of fertility and knowledge but also as a means through which people communicated with each other.’ Critically, they helped to position farmers and their soils within particular and understood frameworks.... Throughout the Middle Ages a growing concern can be perceived at all levels of society with the definition of social space.The literal b*llsh*t was interesting enough without the addition of academic b*llsh*t.
Propaganda For The People
Our late, lamented Democratic nominee for President has her own propaganda site now. It's called 'Verrit,' and it's structured to be a safe space for former Hillary supporters. There, if you are one of them, your world view will always be comforted, never challenged.
Consider this piece, titled: "Study: Mainstream Media Acted as Trump's Mouthpiece, Clinton's Foe."
That's right: the argument is that the mainstream media was in the tank for Trump.
The study counts mentions of scandals vs. policy for Clinton and Trump. There are a few problems with this method. I'll describe two.
1) Most of the time, the media coverage treated Trump's policies as scandals in themselves. He got a lot of coverage as to his immigration policies, for example: the tone of the coverage was that the policies were racist, and that only racists would vote for such a racist.
2) Clinton's second-biggest scandal according to the study was "the Clinton Foundation." But the Clinton Foundation wasn't supposed to be a scandal: it was her own chosen vehicle for presenting herself to the American public between the end of her tenure as Secretary of State, and the start of her Presidential campaign. She should have wanted the media to discuss the Foundation as often as possible, as it was the way she elected to present herself. If it was a scandal for her, it's because she ran it in a scandalous fashion.
To a lesser degree, the same is true of her biggest scandal: the email investigation. She didn't choose that specifically for the purpose of presenting it to the public as her chosen image, but she did choose that course of action in order to try to control her public image (and in spite of Federal records laws). But in the case of the Foundation, it's completely on her that the vehicle that she designed for presenting herself turned out to look so bad.
Consider this piece, titled: "Study: Mainstream Media Acted as Trump's Mouthpiece, Clinton's Foe."
That's right: the argument is that the mainstream media was in the tank for Trump.
The study counts mentions of scandals vs. policy for Clinton and Trump. There are a few problems with this method. I'll describe two.
1) Most of the time, the media coverage treated Trump's policies as scandals in themselves. He got a lot of coverage as to his immigration policies, for example: the tone of the coverage was that the policies were racist, and that only racists would vote for such a racist.
2) Clinton's second-biggest scandal according to the study was "the Clinton Foundation." But the Clinton Foundation wasn't supposed to be a scandal: it was her own chosen vehicle for presenting herself to the American public between the end of her tenure as Secretary of State, and the start of her Presidential campaign. She should have wanted the media to discuss the Foundation as often as possible, as it was the way she elected to present herself. If it was a scandal for her, it's because she ran it in a scandalous fashion.
To a lesser degree, the same is true of her biggest scandal: the email investigation. She didn't choose that specifically for the purpose of presenting it to the public as her chosen image, but she did choose that course of action in order to try to control her public image (and in spite of Federal records laws). But in the case of the Foundation, it's completely on her that the vehicle that she designed for presenting herself turned out to look so bad.
We Could Do Worse...
...and probably will.
Long live Mathilda Jones – after finding a huge ‘Excalibur’ sword in the lake from the legend of King Arthur, she is technically the new Queen of England, right?... The Lady of the Lake is said to have held the sword below Dozmary Pool, where Mathilda and her family were visiting, until the next person worthy of the British throne finds it.It sounded plausible to me at points last year.
A Constitutional Question
Attorney General Jeff Sessions unveiled a policy this morning on "DACA" that is far, far gentler than I expected. The administration really is going to continue "deferring action" (the "DA" of "DACA") for six months, even issuing new two-year work permits to those whose existing permits expire in that period. I figured they'd hand off the 800,000 names to ICE this morning and tell them to go round them up, but Sessions says that won't happen: nobody will be passed to immigration enforcement unless they individually are deemed to pose a national security threat.
The administration is quite right that the previous administration simply decided to ignore the law for its own reasons, thus effectively creating new executive "law" that violated existing laws passed in accordance with the Constitution. They are likely also correct that the courts would have overturned the practice eventually, although perhaps not: it would hardly be the first time the SCOTUS has made room for an obviously unconstitutional action recently (e.g., the Obamacare rewrite). The conceit that the NRO writers describe is bipartisan, and exists in the judiciary as well.
No credit will be forthcoming, but the Trump administration has chosen to correct a clear Constitutional violation in a very humane and patient way. Congress now has the opportunity to perform its actual role as legislature, but of course it has had that "opportunity" all along. It has neglected to do so because it liked the violation of its laws just fine, again on a bipartisan basis. Now, then, they'll have to rush to pass a law that enacts the bipartisan consensus that they really believe in.
That should be easy for them to do, although for Republicans in Congress it means admitting to another massive lie. They never intended to repeal Obamacare; and they never opposed massive illegal immigration, which enriches their donors by driving down the cost of American labor.
Mass immigration, and especially illegal immigration, also undermines labor unions; you'd have thought the Democratic party would care about that, but they have decided they have more to gain from demographic change than from organized labor. The only defender of American unions left on the scene is, well, Canada. Everyone else is on board with the policy that the Trump administration is supposedly "unraveling" this morning.
The administration is quite right that the previous administration simply decided to ignore the law for its own reasons, thus effectively creating new executive "law" that violated existing laws passed in accordance with the Constitution. They are likely also correct that the courts would have overturned the practice eventually, although perhaps not: it would hardly be the first time the SCOTUS has made room for an obviously unconstitutional action recently (e.g., the Obamacare rewrite). The conceit that the NRO writers describe is bipartisan, and exists in the judiciary as well.
No credit will be forthcoming, but the Trump administration has chosen to correct a clear Constitutional violation in a very humane and patient way. Congress now has the opportunity to perform its actual role as legislature, but of course it has had that "opportunity" all along. It has neglected to do so because it liked the violation of its laws just fine, again on a bipartisan basis. Now, then, they'll have to rush to pass a law that enacts the bipartisan consensus that they really believe in.
That should be easy for them to do, although for Republicans in Congress it means admitting to another massive lie. They never intended to repeal Obamacare; and they never opposed massive illegal immigration, which enriches their donors by driving down the cost of American labor.
Mass immigration, and especially illegal immigration, also undermines labor unions; you'd have thought the Democratic party would care about that, but they have decided they have more to gain from demographic change than from organized labor. The only defender of American unions left on the scene is, well, Canada. Everyone else is on board with the policy that the Trump administration is supposedly "unraveling" this morning.
Storm
Still no time or adequate internet to do a full post. We're not sure how high the winds got, but the devastation to the trees is extreme. Perhaps a third of the live oaks were destroyed outright, while all others are mostly stumps, and there is not a leaf on a tree in the county. It's eerie to see, as if the live oaks had suddenly become deciduous and it were winter. The houses, however, mostly are OK. Homes built to post-Andrew code are largely fine, though some metal roofs started to peel up and you see a lot of shingle damage. Tile roofs, for some reason, didn't do that well. Few houses came completely apart, even on the waterfront, which surprises me. I'm particularly surprised by how many windows held, even if all the storm shutters weren't put up in time. Really very few windows blew out.
In the height of the storm the house shuddered, but nothing blew in. A gutter was torn off. Some water came in that we think was driven sideways through the fascia, as the roof seems OK to visual inspection and no water came in on the far side of the eye. Yes, the eye went directly overhead. They're saying something like 106 mph sustained, gusts to (you hear various numbers) 130 mph. Our ears popped. The water in the toilets dropped way down into the pipes. Perhaps the worst trouble we had was on the far wall of the eye (we were in the eye a couple of hours), when the wind came around to the front door side, which is a double door opening inward. I no longer like that arrangement. Despite the storm shutters, the wind tried to push that door in. A heavy cypress door flexed visibly. The copper flashing around the door made a bizarre harmonica-like scream. I jammed a chair under the double doorknobs and a rake between the chair and the bottom step of the interior stairs. It still wanted to blow open. Nevertheless, in the end, there was only superficial damage to the house. The trees are awful, simply blasted, post-nuclear-looking. They'll look considerably better when they leaf out. Many will live and thrive.
Our outbuilding all were fine; only the lightweight chicken coops blew apart. The chickens were all safe in the garage.
There were about 12 inches of rain, a moderate storm surge, no flooding at all. The flooding was all east of here, and very bad. Corpus Christi to the southwest was barely hit, so we were able to drive down there almost immediately for supplies.
An astounding army of volunteer and for-profit tree-clearing crews have poured in and made huge progress. With no flooding and so few houses breached, the piles of debris along every street and road are almost entirely composed of trees. I'll get some pictures up when communications improve.
They predict we'll have power back this week: very impressive. They're going to bring two 5MW generators to our little rural peninsula on the tail end of the county, so we won't have to wait for the rebuilding of the entire grid from Victoria to here. Very smart, very appreciated. A huge fraction of the electrical poles are tilting or frankly broken and flat on the ground. I've never in my life seen so many man-lift electrical trucks: there have to be thousands.
We all took the TV images of the President with the Texas flag very kindly, once we got satellite TV back. I feel a real affection for the man this week.
In the height of the storm the house shuddered, but nothing blew in. A gutter was torn off. Some water came in that we think was driven sideways through the fascia, as the roof seems OK to visual inspection and no water came in on the far side of the eye. Yes, the eye went directly overhead. They're saying something like 106 mph sustained, gusts to (you hear various numbers) 130 mph. Our ears popped. The water in the toilets dropped way down into the pipes. Perhaps the worst trouble we had was on the far wall of the eye (we were in the eye a couple of hours), when the wind came around to the front door side, which is a double door opening inward. I no longer like that arrangement. Despite the storm shutters, the wind tried to push that door in. A heavy cypress door flexed visibly. The copper flashing around the door made a bizarre harmonica-like scream. I jammed a chair under the double doorknobs and a rake between the chair and the bottom step of the interior stairs. It still wanted to blow open. Nevertheless, in the end, there was only superficial damage to the house. The trees are awful, simply blasted, post-nuclear-looking. They'll look considerably better when they leaf out. Many will live and thrive.
Our outbuilding all were fine; only the lightweight chicken coops blew apart. The chickens were all safe in the garage.
There were about 12 inches of rain, a moderate storm surge, no flooding at all. The flooding was all east of here, and very bad. Corpus Christi to the southwest was barely hit, so we were able to drive down there almost immediately for supplies.
An astounding army of volunteer and for-profit tree-clearing crews have poured in and made huge progress. With no flooding and so few houses breached, the piles of debris along every street and road are almost entirely composed of trees. I'll get some pictures up when communications improve.
They predict we'll have power back this week: very impressive. They're going to bring two 5MW generators to our little rural peninsula on the tail end of the county, so we won't have to wait for the rebuilding of the entire grid from Victoria to here. Very smart, very appreciated. A huge fraction of the electrical poles are tilting or frankly broken and flat on the ground. I've never in my life seen so many man-lift electrical trucks: there have to be thousands.
We all took the TV images of the President with the Texas flag very kindly, once we got satellite TV back. I feel a real affection for the man this week.
This is how you do it
Our HEB grocery store was open just six days after the storm hit, with good stocks, too. As impressed as I was, this article is even more impressive. Their problem in this area were nothing compared to the widespread flooding to the east. It's a fine, fine company.
Our regular internet isn't back, but I've discovered what I guess everyone else knew already, that we can run the computer on the personal hotspot on our iPhones. I'm so out of it.
Our regular internet isn't back, but I've discovered what I guess everyone else knew already, that we can run the computer on the personal hotspot on our iPhones. I'm so out of it.
Against Identity Politics
James Baker III nor Andrew Young are neither of them men whose politics I much feel close to, but I can't disagree about this.
The U.S. finds itself increasingly divided along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, religion and sexual identity. Countless demagogues stand ready to exploit those differences. When a sports reporter of Asian heritage is removed from his assignment because his name is close to that of a Confederate army general, political correctness has gone too far. Identity politics practiced by both major political parties is eroding a core principle that Americans are, first and foremost, Americans....The piece is padded out with plenty that I can and do disagree with, but this much of it is quite right.
The country faces a stark choice. Its citizens can continue screaming at each other, sometimes over largely symbolic issues. Or they can again do what the citizens of this country have done best in the past-work together on the real problems that confront everyone....
Floodwaters don't distinguish between Republicans and Democrats. Nor do rotting bridges discriminate between whites and blacks. This is an important and easy area to emphasize common interests. Political leaders should prioritize and provide tangible policies that benefit Americans. They are long overdue....
Alexis de Tocqueville, the 19th-century French diplomat who identified strengths in the American experiment, admired the resiliency of the system the Founding Fathers devised. He wrote in the first volume of "Democracy in America" that "the greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults."...
Americans must, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said during a 1965 commencement address for Oberlin College, learn to live together as brothers and sisters. Or, we will perish together as fools.
Spies & Mercenaries
Erik Prince's proposal to privatize the war in Afghanistan has several drawbacks, one of which is that I don't think it can possibly bring about a successful conclusion to that war. All the same, this article in Politico is ridiculously unfair to Prince and his efforts. It's fine to be against doing this, but be reasonable.
Proposed rebuttal: 'Nonsense! The Flying Tigers were not mercenaries!'
QED, dude.
In fact, the Flying Tigers were contractors paid by the Central Aircraft Manufacturing Company, with kill bonuses from the Chinese government. Thus, Prince is right in his analogy, more or less.
The article closes with a shot at Prince's patriotism for seeking work from the UAE and China, just to ad an ad hominem on the end of a terrible argument.
I still think Prince's approach can't possibly work, but good gracious. Isn't it enough to criticize it on its logistical and practical problems?
[Prince] insists contractors should not be stigmatized as “mercenaries,” even though he is proposing armed civilians in conflict zones—the classic definition of a mercenary.I don't know about 'classic,' but there's an in-practice UN definition of mercenaries that does not include contractors.
Instead, he says they are like the Flying Tigers, the popular name of the 1st American Volunteer Group that flew against the Japanese in 1941–42. Here is where his analogy takes a nosedive: The Flying Tigers were not mercenaries.Prince: 'Contractors are not mercenaries. They're like the Flying Tigers.'
Proposed rebuttal: 'Nonsense! The Flying Tigers were not mercenaries!'
QED, dude.
In fact, the Flying Tigers were contractors paid by the Central Aircraft Manufacturing Company, with kill bonuses from the Chinese government. Thus, Prince is right in his analogy, more or less.
Rather, they were U.S. military pilots who took off their uniforms to fly as civilians, so that FDR did not have to declare war. Once war was declared, they flew as American fighter pilots once again.That's a war crime, by the way: perfidy. It also made them legally spies that could be shot on sight.
That’s hardly the same thing as contractors being paid, often exorbitantly, to fight a war on our behalf.Except that they were contractors, paid a fairly decent sum for every kill.
Where will these mercenaries come from? According to Prince, all will be “brave Americans” who are “former Special Operations veterans.” More sales talk. To keep costs down, he will probably have to outsource to the so-called Third World, where military labor is cheap.So, we're just to assume that he's lying about that? Because that would be a closer parallel to the Flying Tigers than you wanted to allow (some being no longer active duty). Also, the fact that they are citizens of a nation that is a party to the conflict is why they're contractors and not mercenaries under the UN rule.
When I was in the industry, I worked alongside other ex-special forces and ex-paratroopers from places like the Philippines, Colombia and Uganda.You know who trained those ex-special forces from the Philippines before they were "ex"? American Special Operations forces.
But do we want Filipino, Colombian and Ugandan mercenaries fighting our wars for us, their way?That is literally why we trained them.
Prince assures us that nothing will go wrong. To avoid Nisour incidents in the future, he wants to place all mercenaries under U.S. military law, known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice. However, this resolves little. Take, for example, jurisdiction: What happens if a Guatemalan mercenary massacres an Afghan family while on an American contract?That is exactly the sort of issue that a Status of Forces agreement addresses. The government of Afghanistan would have to agree to terms, and those terms would establish these details.
The article closes with a shot at Prince's patriotism for seeking work from the UAE and China, just to ad an ad hominem on the end of a terrible argument.
I still think Prince's approach can't possibly work, but good gracious. Isn't it enough to criticize it on its logistical and practical problems?
What's a Brigade Between Friends?
DOD confesses it's got a few... more... troops than it has previously admitted deployed in the 'Stan.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)