Voices of sanity

Mark Halperin has been getting good press today. I found this YouTube broadcast featuring Mr. Halperin and a campaign pro from each party, with time set aside for viewers' questions. There are annoying signal glitches with one of the pros, but the information that gets through is interesting and delivered civilly. Around the 29:00 mark, the public comments give some excellent insight into what motivates people to choose a candidate. The first speaker is a libertarian who is disenchanted with the Democratic party, sat out the last two presidential elections, and now has concluded she must vote for Trump. The next speaker is a strident Harris supporter who can't articulate what's good about Harris and is obsessed with outrage over Trump. Halperin works hard to keep the discussions on track, very gently attempting to steer the conversation back to particulars rather than extended venting.

The dominant concern is that Harris will not reveal her policy.

I'm seeing a lot of commentators begin to emphasize the need to prepare for one's candidate to lose next month, no matter which candidate each of us supports.

2 comments:

Grim said...

Like the Washington Post?

https://x.com/ParkerThayer/status/1849851358586995199

E Hines said...

The cynic in me (believe it or not, there is one) thinks WaPo is saying no more endorsements in the future solely to disguise the fact that the editors (or Bezos, or both) can't stand either of the current two candidates.

I think they'll be back with endorsements starting in 2028, unless they decide they don't like Vance and whoever the Progressive-Democrats put up then.

Eric Hines