The US is currently debating whether or not to spend $5 Billion constructing a partial steel fence along the southern border. The NYT reports that the US has spent $8 Billion on the Afghan Air Force -- which is still "struggling."
Which of these is really more relevant to US national security? Which one is more cost-effective?
1 comment:
Which one is more cost-effective?
So far, the Afghan effort, since there's nothing regarding the border wall. The Progressive-Democrats refuse to negotiate that at all, and Pelosi has said in so many words that even were the government back fully open, she'd continue to block funding for the wall.
Eric Hines
Post a Comment