There are some people in politics and in the press who can't be confused by the facts. They just will not live in an evidence-based world. And that's regrettable.Yeah, funny thing about that: some of us would really like to base our criticism on Benghazi on solid evidence. For example, an investigation that was actually allowed access to the site would have been very desirable.
How about declassifying relevant documents so we can criticize you based on the evidence? Apparently Congress isn't up to the task, and most of the media hasn't exactly pulled out the stops either. For example, this interview appeared not to involve a great deal of pressure on her claims here. 'Secretary Clinton, let me ask you about Benghazi.' 'Well, my opponents are a regrettable and disappointing lot who don't know what they're talking about.' 'I see, thank you. We'll rush that right to press!'
4 comments:
Maybe she just doesn't want to confuse us with the facts, since she knows that's a special problem for us, and it makes her sad.
What difference does it make?
Apparently a fair question.
"What difference does it make" with a soundtrack.
Post a Comment