Check out the wind map. It looks like a hurricane over Oklahoma City.
After the front passes through this evening, we're supposed to get 3-4 days of lovely, cool weather. Time to get out and attack some weeds that are as tall as I am.
We're on an all-eggplant, all the time diet this week, even after driving around and handing out bags of eggplants to our neighbors. Eggplant is one of the few crops, besides peppers, that do well here in the dog days of summer.
Roadblocks and workarounds
Stalling the Keystone XL pipeline may not keep all that Canadian tar-sand oil under the ground after all.
You're a Thousand Years Late
PBS wants you to consider suicide.... er, well, end-of-life care short of lifesaving. We may still yet avoid the Death Panels if we can get enough of you to volunteer of your own good will!
The better way is to live otherwise from the beginning, as we were told in the Havamal.
Some of you, perhaps the ones with less Viking blood, may prefer the Irish version of the sentiment.
The better way is to live otherwise from the beginning, as we were told in the Havamal.
The coward believes he will live forever
If he holds back in the battle,
But in old age he shall have no peace
Though spears have spared his limbs
...
Cattle die, kindred die,
Every man is mortal:
But the good name never dies
Of one who has done well
Cattle die, kindred die,
Every man is mortal:
But I know one thing that never dies,
The glory of the great dead.
Some of you, perhaps the ones with less Viking blood, may prefer the Irish version of the sentiment.
Herodotus
Whatever bad things anyone has said about Herodotus -- aye, even Aristotle -- the histories he wrote are among the most interesting things you will ever read. Yet among scholars he has a respect he didn't used to enjoy:
Cicero called Herodotus the “father of history.” Yet Arnaldo Momigliano, the great 20th-century historiographer of the ancient world, ends his brilliant essay on Herodotus by noting, “It is a strange truth that Herodotus has really become the father of history only in modern times.” History, or, more precisely, historical methods, Momigliano explains, finally caught up with Herodotus. Ethnographic research brought a new respect for Herodotus’ own early interest in ethnography. Those who did archaeological exploration in Egypt and Mesopotamia found Herodotus’ writings on these subjects useful. His writings also became valuable to biblical scholars in their study of Oriental history. Oral history, on which he drew heavily, became a standard tool of modern social science and history. Herodotus was also the first serious historian to give due attention to women. In his Histories, he devotes several pages to Artemisia, the queen of Halicarnassus, who commanded the Asian Dorian fleet during Xerxes’ attack on Greece. As for his accuracy, Momigliano writes, “We have now collected enough evidence to be able to say that he can be trusted.”Well, it's not a one-off thing; Herodotus writes about the women of almost every civilization he discusses. And I say "almost" only because I don't want to go back through a long and detailed book to make sure it's fully 100% of them; but I can't recall one where he didn't.
Herodotus’ philosophy arises out of the plentitude of his details. This philosophy holds men to be perpetually in peril of overstepping their bounds—bounds set by good sense and reinforced by the gods. Those who do not understand this go under. But even those who understand may not necessarily come to a good end. Herodotus provides story after story proving that human justice is not the first order of the gods.So it seems.
Doorbells
Megan McArdle posted about the California law requiring affirmative consent for sexual encounters. She objected to the strange tone of a Jezebel post responding to an argument that intrusive consent requirements might ruin sex, where I found this interesting comment:
I expect friends to drop by unannounced sometimes. They know they can count on me to speak up if there's some reason they can't come in. Don't we expect a lover to make a few presumptions, too, as long as he keeps his eyes and ears open for our response, which won't always be signed, sealed, and notarized? There are always people who can't take a hint, and you gradually ease them out of your life, without making a federal case out of it.
Funny how I've never had anyone tell me that doorbells have ruined inviting friends over.Clever, but I'm not convinced it works. Doorbells are for strangers, aren't they?--or for friends who are being at least a bit formal. Is that a good model for lovers, or should we assume that communication in that context is a lot more tacit?
I expect friends to drop by unannounced sometimes. They know they can count on me to speak up if there's some reason they can't come in. Don't we expect a lover to make a few presumptions, too, as long as he keeps his eyes and ears open for our response, which won't always be signed, sealed, and notarized? There are always people who can't take a hint, and you gradually ease them out of your life, without making a federal case out of it.
Card-carrying non-infidels
ISIS is issuing certificates, good for three months, showing that persons unlucky enough to be caught in their territory are provisionally considered non-infidels:
To whom it may concern,
We hereby notify you that the one named Na’il Salu bin Basaam of the people of the al-Raqa emirate took and satisfactorily passed a course on Repentance.
Based on this, we hereby grant him this certificate confirming that he is not an infidel [kafir] and that it is impermissible to lash, crucify, or rape him, unless a legitimate reason arises for the soldiers of the caliphate or if it’s been established that he has returned to apostasy and wants his freedom.That's almost as bad as requiring a voter i.d., which is just like a poll tax.
A & ~A: It's the Law
News from the Pacific Northwest:
Two competing measures on the Washington state ballot this fall ask voters to take a stance on expanded background checks for gun sales. One is seeking universal checks for all sales and transfers, including private transactions. The other would prevent any such expansion... What happens if both pass on Nov. 4 is anyone's guess, though the Washington secretary of state's office has said that either the Legislature or the courts would have to sort it out.Well, the Legislature could sort it out by passing a new law that superseded both measures. How would a court sort it out, though? It's a logical contradiction, passed by majorities of voters in the same way at the same time via the same method. The stronger majority wins? Both laws are null and void?
Restless urges
U.S. oil producers have begun to export their product for the first time in almost 40 years, and imports are dropping. (The two don't match exactly, because there are different levels of crude with different markets, much of the variance having to do with what product our expensive refineries were designed to handle.)
The current administration is uneasily going along with an export-restriction loophole for now. As usual, politicians can't decide whether the problem is that resulting fuel prices will be too high or too low, but they're gearing up to interfere somehow, once the midterms are over. For one thing, if you let people sell their product, they'll just frack more, and we can't have that.
The current administration is uneasily going along with an export-restriction loophole for now. As usual, politicians can't decide whether the problem is that resulting fuel prices will be too high or too low, but they're gearing up to interfere somehow, once the midterms are over. For one thing, if you let people sell their product, they'll just frack more, and we can't have that.
Snooping through Private Things
Samuel Beckett was very clear on the subject of whether he wanted his letters published after his death. Most of them were to a lover, and in addition to being private, were on the subjects he thought divorced from his art.
So, of course:
Honor is without price.
Writing in January 1958 to his American publisher Barney Rosset, he declared, “I dislike the ventilation of private documents. These throw no light on my work,” and the next day, to the theatre director and long-time Beckett collaborator Alan Schneider, “I do not like publication of letters.”In the last days of his life, under pressure from many whose meal ticket depended in part on having continued material from him to publish (or analyze, in the case of the academics), he relented -- a little. He agreed that only those letters that had bearing on his work might be published for study.
So, of course:
Surely there is nothing in a writer’s life or letters that does not have a bearing on his work, as life and work inextricably commingle.The first two volumes! Irrelevant, private material now published in two thick, academic volumes for your pleasant consideration in direct violation of the author's wishes -- even that small exception extorted at his deathbed.
This problem was more acute in the first two volumes. In the period of his life that they covered, from 1929 to 1956, Beckett was virtually unknown to the public, and the majority of his letters were, inevitably, personal. However, the thing was managed, and those first two volumes are substantial indeed, and seem destined to be the most interesting of the projected four.
Honor is without price.
The special burden of being me
Gwynneth Paltrow explains how the lack of a routine in her life made it unusually hard to hold her marriage together.
New wine in old skins
Richard Fernandez on paradigm shifts:
But Obama’s not without ideas. He’s full of ideas, all of them out of date. All of them from the last century’s paradigms. He wanted to become like European social democracy at the very moment when it finally collapsed into the dust-bin of history. He hankered after the ideals of ‘progressivism’ when it had already become reactionary. He is like a man who has saved all his life to buy a pair of bell-bottomed pants only to reach the required sum just when they were 40 years out of style. He’s at the store looking to buy them and can’t find them on the rack.H/t Maggie's Farm.
Hope Ya'll Have Enjoyed Georgia's Excellent Season...
...because it's apparently over.
If this guy had just asked around campus, people would have given him $400. Heck, season he's had, some of them would have given him $400 each.
UPDATE: After a convincing 34-0 win, I suppose the winning season is not completely over.
If this guy had just asked around campus, people would have given him $400. Heck, season he's had, some of them would have given him $400 each.
UPDATE: After a convincing 34-0 win, I suppose the winning season is not completely over.
Riding in the Rain
Good ride today. Dodged the thunderheads as well as I could, as long as I could, but rode back in it. It's a good idea to stay out of the stuff because it isn't safe, but it is invigorating.
It's a good time of year. The firewood was laid in during the summer, and needs no more attention until it's time to start bringing it in during the cold. Need to clear some weeds now that the cool weather will slow them growing back, weed-and-seed that pasture. Clear the gutters, a few other tasks, but mostly the autumn season is relaxing. It is full of beautiful days, when there's 'no better place than the saddle, and no better companion than the rifle or the oar.'
It's a good time of year. The firewood was laid in during the summer, and needs no more attention until it's time to start bringing it in during the cold. Need to clear some weeds now that the cool weather will slow them growing back, weed-and-seed that pasture. Clear the gutters, a few other tasks, but mostly the autumn season is relaxing. It is full of beautiful days, when there's 'no better place than the saddle, and no better companion than the rifle or the oar.'
What do women want?
If they're female voters in Kentucky, and they're interested in a functioning economy, it turns out they may want a candidate who's not anti-coal, even if she's a card-carrying member of the no-war-on-women party:
Simply having the correct set of genitals does not mean that one is going to fall in line with the predicted talking points of the day. The women voters of Kentucky seem to have more on their minds than just how much contraception costs. They have families to raise and bills to pay like anyone else. When the Democrats run a candidate who is anti-coal and so many jobs in the local economy depend on that industry, that resonates more than hours of glam commercials. Bluegrass values tend to be fairly old school, and I’m guessing that a lot of these Southern Belles don’t spend their days glued to the latest talking points from Debbie Wassermann-Schultz.
Maybe … just maybe … you have to really talk to – and listen to – the voters and look beyond their gender, their skin color or which church they attend. What a novel concept.
Where y'all from?
This is a dialect quiz from a year or so ago. It places me somewhere between Jackson, Mississippi, and my actual hometown, Houston. I tried to choose the answers that seemed most natural from my childhood, though sometimes two answers seemed equally valid, perhaps from listening to other people's conversation over the years. For instance, I'm pretty sure we said "pillbug" at home, but "doodlebug" seems right, too. I might call an 18-wheeler a semi or a tractor-trailer, interchangeably. I was taught to say "feeder road," but I also say "frontage road." I say "crawfish" and "crawdad" without much preference. I say "cray-ahn" and can't remember ever hearing anyone say anything different. I say "cair-ah-mel" not "car-mel." For "aunt," I say "ant," not "awwwnt." Do people really say "loy-yer" instead of "law-yer"? Yankees, please advise.
A Silly Question
Cass was schooling me on the equal protection clause recently and a random, silly question popped into my squirrelly brain.
First, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
And now, the silly question:
Yeah, I fully expect to get slapped, but hopefully it will be an educational slap.
First, the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment:
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
And now, the silly question:
Tangentially, if we apply the equal protection clause as it's written, doesn't it eliminate any limits on marriage or age or ability? Polygamy should certainly be allowed for every reason same-sex marriage is, but not only that, what about all the age discrimination?I should have said, "... as it's written and the courts have interpreted it" given that the courts have interpreted it to preclude state bans on same-sex marriage.
Wouldn't any drinking age above 18 be unconstitutional under this clause? Clearly, we are depriving citizens of a privilege w/o due process of law. Could we even have a legal age of majority at all? Are 2-year-olds not citizens?
Just thinking out loud. Anyone know?
Yeah, I fully expect to get slapped, but hopefully it will be an educational slap.
Labels:
14th Amendment,
equal protection,
silly questions
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)