Purported inside story
I have no idea how accurate this summary of the current U.S./Israel surgical-strike cabability is. It sounds plausible to me, an amateur, but you guys may know better.I can say with some confidence that it reads unmistakably as the style of an AI product, with characteristic "It wasn't A: it was B" structures and a certain "punchiness."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I’ll read it when it isn’t such a pretty day for riding. I’ve also noticed that AI structure; I wonder why they favor that rhetorical approach so strongly?
It feels like overclaiming. Somewhere or other, no matter how good your spying is, there has to be room for Murphy.
I'm no expert, but to me it reads as a snow job. Lots of technical jargon thrown around, with no explanation of how it's relevant, and sometimes plainly incorrect info (The mention of LiDAR and synthetic apeture RADAR for seeing inside things- neither can do that, for instance). I think there's a lot of truth in terms of the general idea of layering multiple sources of information together to form a more complete picture- that's pretty standard practice now I'm sure, with all the information we can gather if you have the right resources.
Post a Comment