Your government, at the state and federal level, the FBI, government agencies can be in on the scam. That is the realization slowly being accepted by millions of Americans.We have technologies that can identify dead voters the moment they cast a ballot. We can identify people who are out-of-state, voted twice, are underage, live in a vacant lot or a UPS or FedEx postal box. We can even show a photo of that vacant lot so you can see where your fake neighbor claims to live.Literally, the second their ballot is counted, they can be flagged as a likely fraud.Yes, we can deploy that technology today....The question is, if the government is pretty much in on the election fraud, does it really matter?
It is important to note, however, that the government is not the sovereign. It may be that they have forgotten who the sovereign really is.
3 comments:
It's depressing, that these are the experts that understand the problem. Depressing that they can view it dispassionately.
Philosophers differ on the value of dispassion vs. anger in the face of great crimes. Kant might tell you that the dispassionate approach should be reassuring, because you can trust that the dispassionate man is not being misled by passion in describing the affront as a moral crime. Platonists might suggest, instead, that the virtuous man should be outraged by crimes, especially crimes against the honor of one's family or state.
Aristotle's opinion is that there should be a mean between the extremes, which results in the right degree of anger floating between 'none' and 'great' depending on the severity of the offense.
I'd argue that at times one should have great outrage, but mediated and balanced by great self control.
Post a Comment