I enjoyed Assistant Village Idiot's essay today about "kids today" and "kids yesterday." He suggests that these complaints suffer from the usual problems of nostalgia's rose-colored lenses. He also posits his pet theory that the most economical explanation of the social changes of the last century is that teenagers in the 50s acquired disposable income for the first time in history. This theory parallels the notion that obesity and other diseases of plenty are a result of millions of years of evolution amid scarce resources, suddenly confronting an embarrassment of riches that our genes aren't prepared for.
Almost my favorite part, though, was this comment quoting an exchange between the writer and his 13-year-old daughter:
D: When you get your license, our auto insurance costs will increase dramatically.
E: Why?
D: Because 16 year olds are stupid.
E: Thanks Dad.
D: Nothing personal. All 16 year olds are stupid. I was stupid when I was 16. It's just the nature of things.
E: Nothing personal?
D: No. And it may be small comfort to know that older people are also stupid. People are just stupid generally. The difference is that as you get older, the kind of stupidity changes. It tends to be less immediately life-threatening, and tends more toward the kind of stupidity that merely ruins your life -- or what's left of it. Insurance companies don't care about that.
That gave her something to chew on.
No comments:
Post a Comment