Today's NY Times article on the DPRK negotiations includes this gem from Colin Powell:
Mr. Powell said the North Koreans had not threatened during the talks to begin testing nuclear weapons. They never "used the word test," he said.Did they use the word "is"? Or was it just that we can say they didn't use the word "test," as the statements were written in Korean?
The DPRK has, in the past, signed specific treaties and then broken them immediately. The State Department is now trying to read things into their choice of words in nonbinding negotiations? This is akin to a judge deciding to let a career criminal go unpunished, not because he promised not to rob any more banks, but because, describing his plans to visit the bank next week, he didn't use the word "rob."
No comments:
Post a Comment