My county closed down the public beaches and boat ramps, not so much because they couldn't be used safely, as because the citizens vocally feared an influx of bored tourists fleeing quarantine in the teeming, scary, infected cities. It surprised me: I thought the voters would rebel, but instead a solid majority cheered the measure.
Several weeks have passed, however. We have had only two confirmed COVID-19 cases, neither of which had to be hospitalized, and both are recovering, perhaps even past the presumed contagious phase.
Yesterday the local Navigation District commissioners met. They are bound by the county's order, but most of the affected beaches and public boat ramps are in their geographical jurisdiction. The Nav District voted to remove the barricades the county had asked them to place on the beaches and ramps, and announced their intention to ask the County Judge to modify his lockdown order. In the meantime, everyone appears to acknowledge that the beaches and ramps technically still are closed, but no one from the Nav District or, apparently, the local police, intends to enforce the closure. Part of the reasoning was that local short-term rentals are still prohibited, so we shouldn't face much of a tourist influx.
I foresee an upheaval in the next few weeks as counties begin to implement the governor's instructions to re-open businesses carefully, starting with curbside delivery. A constituent called me earlier this week wanting to know whether the county was enforcing any requirement for take-out restaurant workers to wear masks. There is no rule requiring food workers to wear masks, though I did encourage her not to patronize any restaurant whose safety practices didn't suit her. She wanted to discuss her unhappiness with a particular restaurant. I urged her not to eat there. She wanted to talk about the special health needs of a live-in relative. I suggested that, given that relative's special needs, she might want to consider not eating at any restaurants for the duration. I mention her because I get the impression from social media that she's far from alone. She wants to concentrate on limiting the freedom of others rather than on her own options for hunkering down in safety, at some minor inconvenience to herself, but at no serious cost.
As always, my concern is less with these inconveniences, and almost entirely with the people who are missing paychecks, and for whom the situation is getting critical. Those of use who want or need to guard ourselves carefully are getting every opportunity to do so. No one is making us go into any dangerous buildings. The local hospitals are, if not exactly fine, at least no more inadequate than they ever were. We're going to have to open the economy back up, carefully but soon. Lots of masks and spacing, fine, but get those jobs back ASAP. So I'm pleased to see at least one local government flex its muscles a bit, and I'm curious to see how the public reacts.