The Right and the Wrong Way to Learn About Your Ancestors

Two new works on Medieval sexuality have been brought to my attention in recent days. I'm going to bring them to yours, because they exemplify two very different approaches to understanding the past. One of them is good. One of them is so wrong I almost don't know where to begin explaining why.

Let's start with the bad one: Ogling Ladies: Scopophilia in Medieval German Literature. Here's a description of the approach and findings.
"Successfully applies modern psychoanalytic theory to analysis of medieval texts in a creative way..." The love of looking, or scopophilia, is a common motif among female figures in medieval art and literature where it is usually expressed as a motherly or sexually interested gaze—one sanctioned, the other forbidden. Sandra Summers investigates these two major variants of female voyeurism in exemplary didactic and courtly literature by medieval German authors. Setting the motif against the period’s dominant patriarchal ethos and its almost exclusive pattern of male authorship, Summers argues that the maternal gaze was endorsed as a stabilizing influence while the erotic gaze was condemned as a threat to medieval order.
So we are interpreting what the Medievals were doing according to a completely modern form of analysis, which functions as a kind of meat grinder that produces findings in the shape that the grinder itself is designed to produce. If you apply Freudian analysis to the ancient Greeks, you won't get a picture that looks much like Homer, but you'll get one that looks a lot like Freud.

Unsurprisingly, then, we discover what our modern thinker expected to find: a deep fear of female sexuality, and a forbidding refusal to permit its expression.

Now let's look at the good approach. Why not just translate the poetry and read it?
The poems, many with unprintable names, offer a glimpse into the Middle Ages that has nothing to do with courtly love, warring knights or church teachings. Instead they show cuckolded husbands, randy priests, lusty women—and a fondness for scatological humor....

These racy poems shed light on the lives of regular people in medieval times. "This shows the common people being as down and dirty as you can get. It will change people ideas about the Middle Ages as dark and church-bound and unknowable," says Mr. Bloch....

"The Fisherman of Pont-Sur-Seine," exemplifies the power negotiations between a man and wife, says Mr. Dubin. In the tale, a wife loves having sex with her fisherman husband, but tells her husband otherwise, so as not to seem crass. To prove that his wife is lying, the fisherman happens upon a dead priest in the river and cuts off his genitals. He presents them to his wife as his own, saying that knights attacked him. Furious, the wife readies to leave him. When she reaches into his pocket to take money for her trip, she realizes he's lying and flings her arms around him, happy again. The fisherman is pleased to have made his point.
Both of these books have Medieval sexuality as their subject, but only one of them is really a book about the people of the Middle Ages.

9 comments:

David Foster said...

Ha, I was just reading a comment at another blog wherein someone said that women had never been allowed to enjoy sex prior to modern times and indeed that probably no woman ever had an orgasm before about 100 years ago.

It's amazing how many people think the the most extreme mid-Victorian prudery and/or a cartoonish image of the American 1950s, represent all of pre-1960s history.

Maybe the book of medieval poetry would be a good remedy.

Texan99 said...

Even an understanding of extreme mid-Victorian prudery can lead you astray if you fail to reflect that the entire world was not populated by gently reared Englishwomen of a certain class.

David Foster said...

Tex...yes. And I bet even some of those gently-reared Englishwomen were having more fun in bed than they were "supposed" to have.

Gringo said...

My understanding is that Carmina Burana has some rather sexy lyrics. At least when I recommended it to a high school music teacher for his chorus to perform in a concert, the response came back that parents would object to the lyrics.

One problem with seeking to understand OUR medieval ancestors is that most of our medieval ancestors were illiterate peasants. As such, they left us no written record.

Our understanding will be limited.

David Foster said...

Gringo..."One problem with seeking to understand OUR medieval ancestors is that most of our medieval ancestors were illiterate peasants. As such, they left us no written record."

True dat. A partial analogy might be if all today's written and computer records were destroyed, except backup copies of blog posts made by PhD faculty at a specific Ivy League institution...and future historians had to reconstruct our society using only these for written records.

Grim said...

Well, if that's a fit analogy, no wonder the picture is so messed up.

David Foster said...

Grim....reminds me of Koestler's remark that "the British have sex on the brain, which is a very poor place to have it"

Anonymous said...

Those "gently reared Englishwomen" were the rare exception, not the rule.

Grim said...

Her point.