I’m not sure how newsworthy this is, because my source is my wife sending me a Facebook link. However, I hadn’t heard of it before now.
That may be because it’s not exactly earth-shattering. It’s an older inscription than before, but in an area where younger inscriptions have been found. It was also supposed to be a challenging translation, which also means that there might be some doubts about it.
Still, it’s a subject of discussion here.
2 comments:
If this is what I think it is, here's Jackson Crawford's take
and a longer discussion with Krister Vasshus (University of Bergen).
Post a Comment