With a hat tip to D29, a new book analyzes the election of 2020 with some care. The author is careful, for example, not to focus only on the one side of things: the book has chapters on fraud claims that obviously proved false, such as the 'Kraken' claims. The author is also careful to say that the Biden administration was the legal winner... just not the credible winner.
If you follow the third link, you'll find several excepts that give one claim each from each of the swing states. Some of them are pretty explosive even after all this time. I'll give just one of those, and leave you to read the rest if you find it intriguing. It's from Georgia, the one of these states I know best.
The number of unsupportable ballots found for [Atlanta's Fulton] county is forty-five times larger than Biden’s margin of victory for the entire state. Here are just five of the 15 findings:
- Although it takes one second to scan a ballot, there are over 4,000 ballots with precisely the same timestamp -- to the second. Not possible.
- 16,034 mail-in ballot authentication (sha) files were added several days after scanning. Also impossible.
- There are no ballot images to support 17,724 final certified recount presidential votes.
- There are no images to support 374,128 “certified” in-person votes, which is a violation of both federal and Georgia law.
- 132,284 mail-in ballot images have no authentication files.
I assume the author's description of Biden as the "legal" winner is an attempt to stay out of jail by warding off, say, an FBI investigation into himself. I notice that he identifies several law violations even in just the article excerpts. That certainly sounds like a lawless election to me, from which therefore there could be no lawful winner.
I suppose it is no surprise that a nation that can no longer define the difference between a man and a woman also makes fuzzy distinctions between lawful and legal.
3 comments:
Biden is a Legal winner?
uh no
uh, HELL NO.
Anybody that says Biden won is an emasculated liar.
Theodore Dalrymple:
....Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.....
Greg
If you aren’t able to recognize that this guy is on your side, and performing a very helpful service to your side, you are the one who is a liability to your side. Fighting with him on those grounds instead of advancing the ball he is trying to hand off to you is as counterproductive as possible.
Conservatives often make this error; probably the most intense progressive does too. You’ve got plenty of enemies. Why pick a fight with an 80% ally? Purity should be sought in religion, not politics.
Fried is a CPA who does financial audits. His point seems to be simply that while Biden is the officially recognized winner of the election, a number of the state elections could not be certified under accounting standards. Of course, the states don't require accounting standards for election audits.
This is a problem across the board, it seems. The state and federal governments are not held to the same standards as corporations, which should definitely change. This is not just true for voting, but also for budgets and expenditures, and probably a number of other areas. Our governments should be required to meet the same standards they have set for corporations and the rest of us.
Post a Comment