It is impossible to make a similar estimate for Vice President Kamala Harris, Mr. Trump’s Democratic opponent this fall. She has not laid out any tax or spending plans, or other economic policy proposals, with enough detail to estimate whether they would add to deficits or reduce them.
In fact there aren't any plans at all, and all of the old positions are recanted.
Ms. Harris, who began seeking the Democratic nomination late last month immediately after Mr. Biden stepped aside and endorsed her, has no policy proposals posted on her campaign website — economic or otherwise.
The media has settled upon a new idea, whose unity of expression shows that it is clearly coordinated with her campaign: she is the candidate of joy!
But she was selling herself as a prosecutor, remember? There's nothing joyful about prosecution. Alongside executioners, prosecutors wield the hammer of the state against members of the public. It is to be hoped that this is done in the interest of justice (as it manifestly was not in her case, as Tulsi Gabbard pointed out). It is not a happy job, however.
I suppose this makes sense to the media because they feel joyful when contemplating four years of being governed by a prosecutor like her. Too, there's a kind of sense to the promise that if only she's elected the media will do its best to fill our screens with joy instead of the rage, bitterness, and anger that will be our daily bread from them if we don't listen.
Still, it's another astonishing maneuver, akin to the earlier attempt to sell us on the basis that she's a career professional politician -- akin to a practiced surgeon.
Obviously the election isn't really about any of this, because none of this makes any sense. I can't decide if they're doing this because they can't think of anything better, or if they're so sure of the election's 'fortification' that they don't feel they need to run a real campaign. You'll find out what our economic policies are after the election, peasants.
7 comments:
What's the plan [Harris' plan] for that? There isn't one, a fact even the New York Times has begun to notice.
I disagree with this point in the OP and with the cited NYT passage. As another member of the media put it, Harris is "slipstreaming behind the Biden administration policies."
That's a clear statement that she intends to continue the Biden-Harris push for profligate taxing and even more profligate spending.
Nor are those policies limited to domestic economic matters. The slipstreamed and so proposed Harris-Walz policies include open borders and the policy of speaking loudly while carrying no stick at all regarding our nation's most dangerous enemies, Russia, the People's Republic of China, and Iran.
Eric Hines
As much as I don’t like those policies, I would be reassured if she formally endorsed them. Maybe that’s what she thinks; maybe that’s what she’ll do. Maybe that’s the smart way to vote. No promises though.
Of course, what are political promises worth anyway?
Still, it’s striking that there is no discussion with the citizenry about what precisely they’re supposed to vote for. Our Team, I guess.
Those policies have been broad disasters. That, it seems to me, is why she's merely slipstreaming and not openly espousing them.
Eric Hines
New strategy: The Tabula Rasa Campaign!!
FWIW, her Wisconsin commercials promise abortion and "lower prices" which will be obtained by squeezing "greedy corporations."
I think they've concluded that hardly any voters make decisions on the basis of the policies they believe are most likely to produce good results. They tend to go with a gut feeling about which candidates seem to care about the things they care about, or say they do, anyway. Or which candidates are traditionally associated with people or groups the voters are comfortable with.
they believe that being Not-Trump is the only thing that matters
as in: any policy, any exercise of power, any reversal, anything at all really - is okay if the alternative is Trump
Post a Comment