Fewer are willing to take the next step and accept that most people living in the United States today—certainly more than half—are not Americans in any meaningful sense of the term.I don’t just mean the millions of illegal immigrants. Obviously, those foreigners who have bypassed the regular process for entering our country, and probably will never assimilate to our language and culture, are—politically as well as legally—aliens. I’m really referring to the many native-born people—some of whose families have been here since the Mayflower—who may technically be citizens of the United States but are no longer (if they ever were) Americans. They do not believe in, live by, or even like the principles, traditions, and ideals that until recently defined America as a nation and as a people. It is not obvious what we should call these citizen-aliens, these non-American Americans; but they are something else.
That's a very grave problem statement. Is it just? I wonder about the percentage -- "certainly more than half" may be overstating the numbers -- but it is certainly true of some percentage. Percentages aside, too, it seems to be true especially of the part that occupies all the seats of power: in government, both elected and the bureaucracy; in corporations; in the media, to include news, social media, and entertainment; and, at the moment at least, even in top positions of the military.
6 comments:
And the education of our youth, let's not forget.
It is not obvious what we should call these citizen-aliens....
How about Lockean outlaws? They have, after all, placed themselves outside our social compact, and they're not just making no effort to reenter, they're actively trying to tear down that to which they no longer belong.
Eric Hines
Clarke says it well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNQRqJitqNI
principles, traditions, and ideals
Almost an integralist definition there, which would eliminate--yes--half or so of the population from his 'citizenship.' Depending on how he cuts the pie on Capitalism (fettered? un-fettered?) it may be all of us who are not citizens.
Maybe we should avoid integralist definitions, if it reduces potential allies from 60% to 20%. Counterinsurgency is about disaggregation; counterrevolution may be as well.
I this said by a political advisor, supposedly conservative, in reference to the Claremont piece:
"To be clear, this is poison and proto fascist and if you believe a bit of it, this isn't the country for you."
I still can't figure out how he arrives at that conclusion.
Post a Comment