We didn't use chemical weapons in World War II. You know, you had a, you know, someone as despicable as Hitler who didn't even sink to using chemical weapons,” Spicer said. “So you have to if you're Russia, ask yourself: Is this a country that you, and a regime, that you want to align yourself with? You have previously signed onto international agreements, rightfully acknowledging that the use of chemical weapons should be out of bounds by every country.Reasonable point he probably intended to make: after World War One, the Western powers agreed that chemical weapons were beyond the pale. Even Hitler did not use them against soldiers on the battlefield, not even when defeat was all but certain.
Why not? Well, in addition to the fact that Hitler himself suffered from a gas attack in WWI, the policy was really "no first use," which meant that Germany's deployment of chemical weapons against soldiers would have opened it to retaliation by similar weapons. The Allies had large stockpiles of these things. So, maybe, Germany restrained itself out of a calculation of enlightened self-interest.
Of course, it may be that someone's thumb was on the scale.
According to Frank J. Dinan, a distinguished professor of chemistry and biochemistry at Canisius College in Buffalo, New York State, a scientist close to Hitler exaggerated the Allies' capability of hitting back with their own chemical weapons, which caused the Fuhrer to rethink his plans.Sarin is the nerve agent Assad is supposed to have used, as you probably know.
If Professor Dinan's extraordinary claim is true, it means that a German scientist, up until now regarded as a war criminal, might be one of the greatest unsung heroes of the 20th century....
Ambros told the Fuhrer the Allies would be able to produce vast quantities of mustard gas, but this didn't bother Hitler.
He wanted to know if the British and Americans also had access to much deadlier nerve agents, such as Tabun.
'I understand that the countries with petroleum are in a position to make more mustard gas,' Hitler said, 'but Germany has a special gas, Tabun. In this we have a monopoly in Germany.'
Hitler then enquired whether the Allies could make Tabun and a similar nerve agent, Sarin.
And it was at this point that Ambros made the claim that Professor Dinan believes may well have changed the course of the war.
Apparently the German leadership kept pressing Hitler to reverse himself, but he never changed his mind once he was told -- completely falsely -- that the Allies could strike back in this way.
3 comments:
The outrage is around the belief that using chemicals for the execution of millions is the same thing. It isn't but propaganda, not accuracy, is the aim.
And I notice that up until the day before yesterday, the fact that the Germans in WWII refrained from using chemical weapons was a commonplace of military history, and it was unremarkable to put it that way.
But now saying that is suddenly Holocaust denial, because Trump.
Sigh. Sometimes I am embarrassed to live on this planet.
Don't worry, this planet is going to die by fire, once the mission is over.
Post a Comment