Collapse

The Taliban are staging a very rapid reconquista of Afghanistan, apparently taking our intelligence and military experts by complete surprise in spite of 20 years of investments in knowing what is going on in that country. They're capturing major amounts of war materiel we have apparently left behind for them (probably they can't long maintain the Blackhawks and MRAPs, even if they can operate them;  hopefully they'll find good use for the small arms supporting the righteous cause of their brother Muslim Uighurs). 

It's bad enough that we spent 20 years training an Afghan army that fell apart at the first touch. It's worse that we had absolutely no idea of how strong the Taliban was even at the last. There was no successful infiltration by these intelligence agencies with the infinite black budgets, no visibility on what they were capable of doing. 

The real lesson is that our institutions have failed. The military never lost a gunfight above the squad level, but they never came close to attaining the conditions for winning the war -- or even understanding what was possible in a place like Afghanistan. The intelligence services are complete failures. The brass should be cashiered, almost across the board; the intelligence community disbanded and replaced. 

But so too so many of our institutions, which are ossified and immobile, helpless and beyond reform. This includes the institutions that would be tasked with reform, such as Congress. 

The Soviet Union did not long survive its adventure in Afghanistan; it may well be that the US Federal Government will not either. Afghanistan itself was too far away to wound us, though it bled us of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars. Yet the rot it reveals in our institutions looms like a sudden terminal diagnosis in the life of a man. 

7 comments:

Texan99 said...

Nothing says abject failure like having to abandon people and materiel because you couldn't quite believe how quickly things would fall apart. At least, the institutions we claim to care about are falling apart quickly. The institutions they care about are turning out to be the resilient sort that can thrive under decades of occupation and imprisonment.

And we've been getting ready to do this, one way or another, for how many years?

Decades ago an older friend who'd taught in school overseas told me of his misgivings about the clash between Western culture and SW Asia. He said the yearbook messages from the Americans read like "I'm so confused, I don't know where my head is at," while the Asians' tended to start with "I am the lion of the desert." Gentle isn't soft, but aimless and demoralized isn't gentle.

Deevs said...

Did we really just leave all our hardware intact for the Taliban to pick up? We didn't even bother to spike the cannons?

Dad29 said...

Two men with experience in 'stan (Erik Prince and Sam Faddis) assert that the Brainiacs of State/Defense began with the wrong assumption--that Afghanistan is a "country."

It's not. It's a bunch of fiefdoms which are not even loosely affiliated except via Muhammedanism.

I deride GWBush regularly for his willful incomprehension of the importance of religion. It's well-deserved derision, although he's hardly the only D.C. creature that is so ignorant.

Anonymous said...

Foggy Bottom and Friends assume that everyone treats religion the way they do. So of course it's not that important, and anyone who says so is just creating propaganda for their version of Deplorables. Once I learned that, from several sources, a lot of our unfortunate* policy and judgement errors made more sense.

LittleRed1

*Preferred adjectives are not suitable for casual use in the corner of civilization that is the Hall.

Grim said...

It occurs to me that in the recent ‘terrorist’ case in Michigan, the FBI had two informants for every plotter. Here, apparently our whole intelligence community had no informants at all. How much did they spend on Afghanistan? What does it say about their priorities that they’ve devoted so much more effort to spying on us that on declared enemies at war?

Christopher B said...

Trump at least attempted to disengage from Afghanistan for four years and was never able to get the job done. Biden's in office 8 months and suddenly we can't get planes to Kabul fast enough to keep the pullout from turning into a dumpster fire? Think maybe somebody thought 'ended the war in Afghanistan' would look good as an ad in 2022?

E Hines said...

Trump at least attempted to disengage....

Trump, too, supposedly left behind a plan for an orderly draw-down of US forces and personnel pursuant to "ending the war."

I have no idea whether that's true, but it's crystalline that no one in the Biden Executive Branch--not merely his White House organization--has or had any sort of idea, much less a plan, for the withdrawal--which Austin, through his Press Secretary Kirby, so cynically termed a retrograde from Afghanistan.

Truly disgusting.

Eric Hines