Satan claimed that eating a particular fruit would not cause anyone to die, but would instead grant them an improved understanding of moral issues. According to Snopes’ assessment, while consuming the fruit has been followed by billions and billions of deaths, those casualties were more of an indirect result, while the part about gaining knowledge of good and evil was generally accurate. They also checked all the lies Satan told Jesus while He was being tempted in the desert and pointed out that he did quote Scripture, albeit out of context, earning the Prince of Darkness another "Mostly True" rating.
BB-Snopes Feud Continues
Headline: "Snopes Rates the Devil's Lies as 'Mostly True.'"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
As others have already suggested, Babylon Bee has figured out that its conflict with Snopes brings more readers to BB web pages.
Given how Flem Snopes is portrayed in Faulkner, I don't understand why anyone would adopt "Snopes" for a blog identifier. While "bringing Snopes to justice" might be one description, "acting like Snopes" might be another. As far as I can tell, we have seen sufficient examples of the website Snopes acting like Flem.
This is a very strange and delicate topic. Who or what is satan? Look in the mirror. The holy spirit is within you because the kingdom of god is you. And if thete be a holy obj then there must be duality wise an unholy spirit that is in you. Thus satan is you. The you that gets afraid. The you that gets angry. The you that believed in leftist carpet baggers. The you that feels road rage. The you that divorced and forgot your father in heaven, source, yhvh, the creator, everything you once were and would become, was replaced by satan ego illusion. Because that is part of the purpose, a job test.
Post a Comment