Progressive-Democratic Party Presidential candidate wannabe
and Senator Kamala Harris (D, CA) wants us to take
our dark history seriously.
We must confront the dark history of slavery and government-sanctioned discrimination in this country that has had many consequences, including undermining the ability of black families to build wealth in America for generations. We need systemic, structural changes to address that.
Absolutely. The
Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark history of slavery and
government-sanctioned discrimination.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of its Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, who ruled that Dred Scott, a
free black man in the north, must be returned to the ownership of his owner—and
who further ruled that blacks could not be citizens of the United States
because blacks were not fully men.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its demand for the States Right of holding
slaves, slavery over which the nation had to fight a bloody civil war to end
because of Party intransigence.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of its creation, the Ku Klux Klan, which it used to terrorize newly
freed blacks—and any who supported them—in the aftermath of the Party's lost
overt slavery policy.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of its Jim Crow Laws, designed explicitly to keep blacks from voting.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of segregation, resumed in full under President Woodrow Wilson (D), who
actively resegregated the Federal government after it had been steadily
integrated following the Civil War, a policy for which Wilson insisted blacks
should be grateful for the "protection," and which continued apace in
schools under the fiction of "separate but equal," which included all
public spaces, and which extended even to sections of buses, drinking fountains,
and rest rooms.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of destroying black families by enacting "welfare" laws that
paid single mothers but not intact families, making it fiscally useful, if not
wholly immoral, for fathers to absent themselves.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of deliberate, overt racial (and gender) discrimination in its
"affirmative action" policies that give special treatment based,
ultimately, on skin color and/or gender.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
history of undermining the ability of black families (such as they're allowed
to exist) to build wealth by keeping them trapped in Party's welfare cage with
the designed-in welfare cliff that prevents welfare recipients—most of whom are
minority recipients, with most of those black—from getting a new job or a pay
raise that would put them above an income threshold that would cut welfare
payments by more than the pay raise.
The Progressive-Democratic Party must confront its dark
present of identity politics that seeks to give special treatment to particular
groups of Americans—which is nothing more than segregation modernized.
The Progressive-Democratic Party does, most definitely, need
systemic, structural changes to address that.
Eric Hines
2 comments:
The fact that black families have not amassed wealth at the same rate is taken as proof that somehow the government, or the culture, or the system, has been preventing this.
This is the heart of the discussion, that many white people, though decent, simply don't want to have. Kamala Harris and others making that point should be asked to give causation evidence.
This should collide squarely with the Constitution's prohibition of "corruption of the blood" and the idea that simple descent does not imply guilt.
Note I said, "should"... No bad idea ever dies the death it deserves.
LittleRed1
Post a Comment