Thesis: Nietzsche's 'death of God' and the death of the Humanities
are the same death.
It happened first in relation to religion, and second, more recently, in relation to culture and the humanities. We all understand what religious secularization has been — the process by which religion, and especially Christianity, has been marginalized, so that today in the West, as Charles Taylor has famously put it, religion has become just one option among a smorgasbord of faith/no-faith choices available to individuals.
A similar process is underway in the humanities. Faith has been lost across two different zones: first, religion; then, high culture. The process that we associate with thinkers like Friedrich Schiller, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Matthew Arnold, in which culture was consecrated in religion’s place, and that in more modest forms survived until quite recently, has finally been undone.
What's strange about this analysis is that the author locates the source of damage in "globalization intertwined with both feminism and decoloniality," which are all hard-left projects (at least for the sort of feminism under discussion, i.e. the sort that undermines the canon precisely because mostly
men wrote it), but the author then goes on to conclude that defending the Humanities is itself to be done for hard-left reasons.
They are to be preserved because they are compelled to push back on the capitalist apparatuses that are dismantling them. In that pushback, what remains of them is aligned with green and radically left anti-capitalist movements.
Sounds like someone has a religion after all! The king is dead; long live the king.
2 comments:
It does seem a bizarre explanation. Perhaps he didn't mind the plague until it was his town that was hit. He then reasoned that the reason the plague was bad was because it hit his town.
https://www.newmessage.org/the-message/volume-1/pure-religion/gods-new-message-for-the-worlds-religions?fbclid=IwAR2jZDZ1PfH8RxcNlAnq6JFSlR-lFu9zN1-vWEfZtouR3I-x64yDZijBWB0
Post a Comment