When put to her, Malmström acknowledged that a trade deal has never inspired such passionate and widespread opposition. Yet when I asked the trade commissioner how she could continue her persistent promotion of the deal in the face of such massive public opposition, her response came back icy cold: “I do not take my mandate from the European people.”The T-TIP's mirror image is the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, which is also being negotiated in secrecy. Congress wasn't allowed to look at the text except in a secured room from which they were not allowed to take notes, and they were sworn not to talk about what they saw. When the Obama administration was asked about opposition, they had the audacity to say that their opponents couldn't name anything specifically wrong with it. Well, indeed they could not: they were forbidden by law.
So who does Cecilia Malmström take her mandate from? Officially, EU commissioners are supposed to follow the elected governments of Europe. Yet the European Commission is carrying on the TTIP negotiations behind closed doors without the proper involvement European governments, let alone MPs or members of the public. British civil servants have admitted to us that they have been kept in the dark throughout the TTIP talks, and that this makes their job impossible.
Both of these treaties need to be shot down or, failing that, abrogated immediately by the first better administration we get.
Yet when I asked the trade commissioner how she could continue her persistent promotion of the deal in the face of such massive public opposition, her response came back icy cold: “I do not take my mandate from the European people.”
ReplyDeleteThis specifically is what I was talking about in the "consent of the governed" thread. This is an illegitimate government decision. If they do not throw this woman out on her ear (and they will not, for who will make them?) then the government itself is illegitimate. Because it does not respond to the will of the governed in the macro.
That's a lot of money going into their pockets and into the pockets of tyrannical totalitarian regimes.
ReplyDeleteThe EU has a majority of what is needed to rule. Resources and (Will)Power. Their authority is a bit nebulous, but the other two can cover up for the lack.
ReplyDelete