Virtue and Physical Fitness

Occasionally one reads columns like this one that suggest that physical fitness is somehow related to politics. 
OK, this is going to sound a little hypocritical, as I have hard-recommended every activity and pursuit, every wellness wheeze and rejuvenation exercise the modern world has dreamed up.... at some time or another, I have insisted to anyone who will listen that it’s only their failure to incorporate, say, a horse into their weekly schedule that is standing between them and their best self.
As a matter of fact, I have also written extensively about the importance of horses to achieving one's best self. It's been a while since it was a regular topic, but at one time that was a major focus of the blog. What I thought it inculcated was courage, not recklessness; gentleness, and the compassion necessary to understand a very different kind of mind and build trust with it; honor, to ride with other people as well as with your horse; and a capacity for building each of these virtues that can become a skill at building virtue itself. 

She worries that it might bring traits that she finds objectionable in politics.
The mechanism is incredibly simple: you embark on this voyage of self-improvement, and more or less immediately see results. You feel stronger and more energetic, probably your mood lifts, and pretty soon you think you are master of your own destiny. You’re still not, by the way: destiny does not care about your step count. But until that fact catches up with you, which it may never, there you are, high on self-righteousness. You can tell this has happened to you when you start inhaling performatively, like the hero of an Ayn Rand novel.

Inescapably, you start to situate other people’s problems within their failure to be as fit as you. This is particularly true if you don’t know them and they’re just a bunch of numbers. All those statistics – depressed people, obese people, people with IBS – imagine how much better they would be if only they took responsibility for their health, the way that you have.
There's always a correlation/causation issue with things like physical fitness and, say, disease; maybe people who are healthier are more likely to engage in physical activities than those who are less healthy to begin with, say. On the other hand, some causal events like stronger bones from strength training and stronger hearts from cardio are provable, and these seem to have follow-on causal effects on health. Likewise, it's pretty clear that exercise both teaches the body to adapt to stress and encourages it to produce higher levels of its own antioxidants. 

Still, what she's really worried about is that you might blame people for their bad luck if they aren't also physically fit. That's fair to some degree, and something to consider.

On the other hand, she is wrong about the nature of virtue. 
I realise it’s not really a question of an unwitting slide into fascism, hastened by a treadmill. It’s more that there is a fixed amount of excellence in any self, and the more you spend on your biceps, the less you have for your personality. 
It's only true that there's a zero-sum game insofar as you're spending all your time building virtue; then you might be building one sort or another. No one, however, is 100% focused on virtue-building. There's always capacity for more.

Rather, virtue building is a skill that you can learn, and you learn it by practice just like you do any of the virtues. Like many things in Aristotle, this is a matter that is conceptually severable even though as a matter of fact the activities are the same. I mean that you practice horseback riding (say) and you develop skill at horseback riding, but also courage, and gentleness, and the rest. Severably, you are learning how to build virtues by building all these virtues. When you want to build another one, you will have greater skill at the business of building any sort of virtue.

The question of what kind of morals one should have thus also ends up being severable. Whatever kind they ought to be, building the moral virtues to support successful practice of those things is just another virtue you can learn. If you've been developing your skills at virtue-building, it'll be easier and you will likely be more successful. All sorts of physical fitness can help with this (although you should be careful of ones that produce concussions, like boxing, where the negative physical effects on cognition may outweigh the virtue-building). It's good for you all the way around.

8 comments:

  1. raven2:37 PM

    I read a bit of it before I had to puke.
    This is what passes for thought these days?
    Her insistence that seeing others as failed and wanting to interfere with them was a "right wing" trait. Please. Is there even a definition of right wing anymore? Seems like it has devolved to "anyone who holds a difference of opinion from us, the appointed purveyors of the truth."

    She ought to get the hell out of the yoga studio and dig a few ditches and toss some hay. Might inoculate some of that right wing "common sense" into her head.

    The problem with prosperity is it has allowed stupidity to reach critical mass.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's more a matter of this Guardian personality being so far Left she's confusing center right and fitness mavens--two separate groups of people--with a mythical right-wing that she's so much in hate with. Separately, her use of the "right-wing" shibboleth is nothing more than her, and too many other news personalities', journalistic laziness in their use of the term as a catch-all for all that they disdain about those more conservative than they are.

    I'm more fit and happier (which may or may not be an outcome of being more fit instead of simply being happier, perhaps from having achieved a measure of personal discipline, perhaps from some wholly unrelated source), and therefor I must--inescapably--start to assign others to unhappiness solely as a result of their supposed lack of fitness?

    On the other hand, her satire might simply have gone way over my head.

    Eric Hines

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure what the value of "right wing" is, which is why I left it out of my own commentary. It is true that a lot of medical problems are just bad luck -- maybe you chose bad parents with poor genes, or maybe you got caught out in a sunstorm that just happened to have a cosmic ray that got through the atmosphere and struck you in such a way as to give you cancer. There's a lot of stuff that can happen.

    It's a fair point that you shouldn't look down on people for reasons like that, and telling them that it's their own fault because they didn't lift enough weight isn't helpful. (It wouldn't be helpful even if it were true).

    The horses really are something, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. She should expand it out to other efforts. Are people responsible for their lesser lives if they don't take the right classes in school? If they don't read the Guardian or something like it enough? Should we want to intervene to nudge them to do a little better?

    She sounds scattered. Some people find that a little caffeine with breakfast helps with that, at least for the morning's two hours of writing. Or am I right wing for wanting to improve her.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:10 AM

    Horses are certainly a healthy alternative and I’m a better cook for it, so certainly there is self improvement with that!

    All About Horse Meat: History, Flavor, and Where It’s Eaten

    https://www.chefspencil.com/all-about-horse-meat/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your article doesn’t go back nearly far enough to explain why the Anglo Saxon culture was so opposed to eating horse meat. The reason is that horse meat consumption was an important part of the worship of Freyr, the Germanic/Norse god of fertility. The French didn’t have to strive with his cult, being Romanized, but the Romano-British were suppressed by the pagan Anglo Saxons. The Venerable Bede talks about the attempt to convert members of those cults, which involve temple burnings even in his time.

      https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/16675/1/Horses%20in%20the%20norse%20sources%20MIS%20thesis.pdf

      I don’t object to eating horses; every beast has his time, and horses are made of meat. There’s just other things you can do with them first.

      Delete
  6. Sorry, I can't get my mind around that.

    I get the impression you inserted all this about eating horses, which is rather off topic, because you like to tweak people and shock.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I marked the second comment as spam. You're probably right, it's just someone trying to be annoying in order to help everyone else have less of a good time.

    ReplyDelete