Durham finally produced an indictment yesterday. The New York Post characterizes it accurately as fresh proof that the Clinton campaign bought and paid for the Russia hoax.
I assume Durham will now try to put pressure on criminal defendant Michael Sussman, a Perkins Coie partner, to implicate others. There will be questions of attorney-client privilege, which crumbles in the context of a criminal conspiracy.
Hopefully Sussman is adequately protected.
ReplyDeleteSH
It is the first evidence that Durham is going to do anything at all, and for that alone I am grateful. It would be fair if Sussman were worked over like Flynn (hey, are his kids involved in any way?), but I still don't like that.
ReplyDeleteBut I am only mildly encouraged. I don't pretend to see through the murk about who is playing who in these DC machinations.
Apparently from the McAfee case, even filing advanced statements of your non-intention to commit suicide isn’t enough.
ReplyDeleteAlthough it was more than a year ago, Kevin Clinesmith was Durham's first indictment. This one is his second.
ReplyDeleteClinesmith plead guilty to doctoring evidence in a FISA warrant application against Carter Page.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/08/19/breaking-the-first-durham-indictment-is-here-n2574370
One indictment a year isn't going to get very far, though.
But I am only mildly encouraged.
ReplyDeleteAs am I. Merrick Garland is AG; I don't anticipate any prosecution.
Eric Hines
These are Q trip wire codes like how spies would post coded messages in the classified.
ReplyDeleteIt is quite clever actually. Even I don't know what the msg means. But this is a msg.
It will be war and Soddom