Contempt versus Contempt

Attorney General Barr was held in contempt today by the House Judiciary Committee for not doing something he is legally forbidden from doing, according to a law passed by Congress. The law states that knowingly violating the rules pertaining to grand jury secrecy may be "punished as contempt of court."

There's a rock and a hard place for you: choose either contempt of Congress or contempt of court. Barr made the right decision, though, because Congress in the current moment merits contempt. My former Congressman says as much himself.

4 comments:

  1. I gather that contempt of Congress is a crime, but contempt for Congressmen is, if not a duty, an almost inevitable sentiment.

    You can probably think of exceptions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not many. Dan Crenshaw.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Barr said a while back he wouldn't be bullied. I suspect they'll find out he meant it, as he appears to mean everything he says. Congress understandably is flummoxed by that aspect of his character.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ymarsakar8:06 AM

    Catch 22. The Inquisition would have loved it.

    Congress are just bought and paid for hacks and tools. They aren't that important. 9/11 could have nuked the White House and the entirety of DC, not much of a loss to us.

    ReplyDelete