The Economist reports on a violation of the Constitution by the Federal government. Kudos to the Congressional committee for bringing it to light. Now let's see what they do with it.
Also, I note that this part seems to fit a pattern: "We have no idea as to the extent of the problem because the DEA did not keep records" of the program. Now why would a bureaucracy choose not to keep records of a program, if only to audit it and see how successful it was?
"We have no idea as to the extent of the problem because the DEA did not keep records" of the program.
ReplyDeleteThat gets right next door to evidence tampering, which is a felony.
Eric Hines