BS- they are so used to getting a totally compliant media that the smallest criticism translates into profound opposition- they have lost the ability to evaluate frequency and amplitude. - exactly the process, different subject, as the "feminists" complaining about various "micro-aggressions". Control freaks gotta control.
Remember the day by day Iraq casualty lists all over the MSM when G.Bush was in office? The first death, the first 100, the first 1,000, any incident involving the deaths of two or more soldiers, any car bombing, the first 1500, the first 2,000, and on and on and on, in a relentless push push push, for years. - then, the Great Leader was elected, and any mention of US casualties was GONE. Despite casualty numbers in Afghanistan that apparently were on the same order. That was a very successful propaganda campaign by a arm of the Democratic party known as the Press.
Of course--because the press' treatment of Bush (pick one) or Romney was entirely just. And the press' treatment of Tim Scott and Herman Cain was up tight.
Besides, Clinton is a fellow Democrat. And she's a girl, so it's owed her from affirmative action to be our next president.
Perhaps a lightweight, light worker. Although in fairness he does seem to find time to do many things I wish he hadn't in between golf games. I'd hate to criticize him for not working enough lest he take it to heart.
Hey, he's a light, worker, so back to the salt mines for you.
As for Hillary, there are many liberals who will not turn on her no matter what she does. They will disbelieve it and claim she is being picked on. Direct all arguments to the 10-20% of Democrats who might defect and to the undecideds. Paying any attention to the others is wrestling in the mud with a pig.
BS- they are so used to getting a totally compliant media that the smallest criticism translates into profound opposition- they have lost the ability to evaluate frequency and amplitude. - exactly the process, different subject, as the "feminists" complaining about various "micro-aggressions".
ReplyDeleteControl freaks gotta control.
Remember the day by day Iraq casualty lists all over the MSM when G.Bush was in office? The first death, the first 100, the first 1,000, any incident involving the deaths of two or more soldiers, any car bombing, the first 1500, the first 2,000, and on and on and on, in a relentless push push push, for years. - then, the Great Leader was elected, and any mention of US casualties was GONE. Despite casualty numbers in Afghanistan that apparently were on the same order. That was a very successful propaganda campaign by a arm of the Democratic party known as the Press.
Of course--because the press' treatment of Bush (pick one) or Romney was entirely just. And the press' treatment of Tim Scott and Herman Cain was up tight.
ReplyDeleteBesides, Clinton is a fellow Democrat. And she's a girl, so it's owed her from affirmative action to be our next president.
Eric Hines
My sense is that casualties in AFG since Obama took office have been much worse. But, you know, he's a Lightworker or whatever, so it's OK.
ReplyDeleteBut, you know, he's a Lightworker or whatever....
ReplyDeleteI think "whatever" works out to light worker.
Eric Hines
Or maybe lightweight worker.
ReplyDeleteEric Hines
Perhaps a lightweight, light worker. Although in fairness he does seem to find time to do many things I wish he hadn't in between golf games. I'd hate to criticize him for not working enough lest he take it to heart.
ReplyDeleteHey, he's a light, worker, so back to the salt mines for you.
ReplyDeleteAs for Hillary, there are many liberals who will not turn on her no matter what she does. They will disbelieve it and claim she is being picked on. Direct all arguments to the 10-20% of Democrats who might defect and to the undecideds. Paying any attention to the others is wrestling in the mud with a pig.