tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post8727611776460567495..comments2024-03-28T16:58:17.705-04:00Comments on Grim's Hall: Higher Dimensions Grimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07543082562999855432noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-83704070680258246812020-06-15T02:13:34.062-04:002020-06-15T02:13:34.062-04:00Articles like this always leave me wanting for mor...Articles like this always leave me wanting for more information. They discuss a central element to this process being the multi-dimensional structures, which are illustrated in one photo- but I'm not clear on what a more than 3-D structure is (they defined it as a cube). I'd like to know more, but a quick internet search did me no good. Interesting, though, that geometry would play such an important role in our thinking. The ancient Greeks may have been onto something.douglashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03241790925053112959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-57541035915716637532020-06-13T11:58:38.350-04:002020-06-13T11:58:38.350-04:00Me, too, Red.Me, too, Red.Tomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-76507529153480636622020-06-13T10:10:24.787-04:002020-06-13T10:10:24.787-04:00It would look like this. A day at star 1 would be ...It would look like this. A day at star 1 would be a thousand years to star k. <br /><br />As such time is no longer a dimensiom but a vibrating membrane or density spectrum. Hence string and quantumml rather than newtonian or einstein time space.<br /><br />Bit there are realms and densities that have no time. This causes a problem similar to macroscopic heisenberg uncertainty princople or simulation theory.Ymar Sakarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-53135376113045316992020-06-13T09:26:25.977-04:002020-06-13T09:26:25.977-04:00On a tangent: back in high school I read one of E...On a tangent: back in high school I read one of Eddington's books, and a throwaway line (*) started me wondering what a world with multiple time dimensions would look like. I wound up studying the easier question of what a 3+1D life would be in a 3+2D universe. (Some Israeli physicists published their own ideas about that, if you want to cheat and "look at the answer in the back of the book".)<br /><br />Yes, you have issues with energy. (A photon on a different timeline from yours will appear to have higher frequency, but not have energy to match.)<br /><br />The environment offers some sci-fi opportunities, if someone wants to try it out.<br /><br />(*) I didn't understand his argument at the time and don't remember it now.jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01792036361407527304noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-52140249981316346042020-06-13T08:37:22.482-04:002020-06-13T08:37:22.482-04:00The concept of dimensions is flawed due to the inc...The concept of dimensions is flawed due to the incorrectness of classical physics basic theory/foundational.<br /><br />THey will find it easier to do things without the dimension of time.<br /><br />So just space 3d + 6 or 7 or 8 or 9.ymarsakarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-48300086734314267112020-06-12T20:43:20.607-04:002020-06-12T20:43:20.607-04:00Some days I have more than enough trouble with thr...Some days I have more than enough trouble with three plus one!<br /><br />LittleRed1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-48518593627206486872020-06-12T20:22:49.304-04:002020-06-12T20:22:49.304-04:004+7
4+7<br /><br />Ymar Sakarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-17317758832586851372020-06-12T18:02:53.161-04:002020-06-12T18:02:53.161-04:00Karl Pribram was, hazily, on the right track.
Eri...Karl Pribram was, hazily, on the right track.<br /><br />Eric HinesE Hineshttp://aplebessite.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-13779946779883734332020-06-12T18:01:25.175-04:002020-06-12T18:01:25.175-04:00I think they're being generous.I think they're being generous.MikeDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08116809134355184859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5173950.post-53031037583189395772020-06-12T16:59:06.449-04:002020-06-12T16:59:06.449-04:00Spinal Tap was right!Spinal Tap was right!Christopher Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00396671757183163171noreply@blogger.com