Fidei Defensor

What authority remains to defend the faith?
Buckingham Palace confirmed this week that King Charles will 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 in 2026. He did issue one last year. But this year — the most important holiday on the Christian calendar — the head of the Church of England went silent. This from the same King who recorded a Ramadan greeting in February, acknowledged a Nigerian president’s “sacrifice” during Ramadan at a State Banquet, and has repeatedly elevated Islamic observances in public addresses... The British monarch’s role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England isn’t ceremonial decoration. It’s a 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 of the Crown, codified since Henry VIII’s Act of Supremacy in 𝟏𝟓𝟑𝟒. A king who won’t perform it has abandoned the terms under which he holds the office.

The demand [by former European Parliament MP Godfrey Bloom] was unambiguous: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘦.” 

Everyone knows that the title Fidei Defensor was given to Henry VIII by the Pope for Henry's defense of Catholicism; ironically Henry decided to keep the title after leading the English Reformation so he could try for sons on a few more wives. However, the Pope of today isn't exactly batting a thousand either.

Pope Leo XIV used his first Easter speech Sunday to deliver a resounding call for peace in times of renewed war, declaring, “Let those who have weapons lay them down!”

No. We often mention Luke 22:36 in this space; the time for laying down arms might come as we look for the Second Coming and the resurrection of the dead. Until it does, we already have a charge on the subject of arms and from a better authority.

Archbishop Timothy Broglio, who heads the Catholic Archdiocese for the Military Services USA, told CBS News in an interview taped Thursday that the war in Iran would not be justified under the “just war” theory applied by the Catholic Church, arguing that while Iran may have posed a threat “with nuclear arms,” the U.S. is compensating “for a threat before the threat is actually realized.”

“The Lord Jesus certainly brought a message of peace and also, I think, war is always a last resort,” he said in the segment that aired Sunday.

If war wasn't your last resort, you didn't resort to enough of it.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:11 PM

    Charles III is certainly doing his best to lend credence to the rumors that he converted to Islam, or is at least very, very sympathetic to Islam in ways that he is not respectful of Christianity.

    LittleRed1

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. His mother only rarely gave Easter messages, and he is undergoing cancer treatments. No official explanation has been given, but perhaps some slack might be cut.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. It’s not my fight, strictly speaking; my ancestors won their part of that fight long ago. All the same, I have to say that the amount of slack that has been cut to the various ‘royals’ defies easy description.

      Delete
    3. As best I can tell, Queen Elizabeth II gave the only Easter address in her reign in 2020, and it seems fair to say she never gave a Ramadan address though she did regularly issued written greetings marking the observance of various non-Christian holidays. It appears there was expectation Charles III was going to make an Easter/Holy Week address his own tradition because unlike Elizabeth II he gave one on Maundy Thursday in 2024 and one marking Easter in 2025. The abrupt and apparently unexplained change this year coupled with the effort to give not just greetings but an address during Ramadan is likely the source of most of the criticism.

      As far as his cancer diagnosis, that was announced in February 2024, and earlier this year it was reported he is scaling back treatments due to positive progress in controlling it.

      Delete