The Practicality of Virtue Ethics

For those of you still interested in further reading (if any!), here is a paper arguing that virtue ethics may in fact be impossible and yet still both practical and desirable.

Tom asked me recently why I don't read contemporary philosophy; this is a good example of why. For thousands of years at least some have striven for the virtues, and those who have lived lives that we often still remember. 

Edward Abbey wrote a few critical things about philosophy, although he was deeply interested in the subject. Once he wrote, "I hate intellectual discussion. When I hear the words 'phenomenology' or 'structuralism', I reach for my buck knife."

Yet I think the most devastating thing he wrote was this: "In metaphysics, the notion that earth and all that's on it is a mental construct is the product of people who spend their lives inside rooms. It is an indoor philosophy."

The idea that the virtues are impossible, because some psychology researchers in rooms somewhere found that they were difficult, is no kind of argument. It's another indoor philosophy. Go tell the Spartans. 

5 comments:

  1. Ooh, ooh, let me be the first: “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.” GK Chesterton "What's Wrong With the World"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also Garrison Keillor: "Philosophers are people who give advice to others who are happier than they are."

    I have a link tomorrow to an essay about Continental philosophers

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:32 PM

    I asked because Grim likes anarchism, a thoroughly modern philosophy.

    - Tom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The name isn’t modern; it’s Greek. An-archon; without a ruler. An-archy; a political system set up to avoid rulers.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:31 PM

      Was it an ancient philosophy? Or did any ancient philosophers discuss it as a reasonable system?

      - Tom

      Delete