In Defense of Skinner

Mentioned in our recent discussion of A Clockwork Orange, B. F. Skinner is one of the least-beloved figures of modern history.  A new article argues that we've got him all wrong.
[His study] turned out to be the crowded basement sanctum of an inveterate tinkerer and gadget guy. Lacking WiFi and Bluetooth in his office, Skinner had jury-rigged strings and all sorts of wooden and cardboard doodads that enabled him to tweak his environment from his desk chair: by hiding the face of a clock he found himself watching, or by turning on a tape recorder that inspired him to organize his thoughts. 
Though more advanced in execution, today’s electronic nudges and tweaks are identical in purpose: use what you can control to affect what you can’t. The simple elegance of this concept flips on its head Chomsky’s suggestion that behavior modification treats people as if they were no more intelligent than animals. What distinguishes our intellect from animals’ is not that we can go against our environment—most of us can’t, not in the long run—but rather that we can purposefully alter our environment to shape our behavior in ways we choose.
Pause and consider; and then we can discuss.

3 comments:

Eric Blair said...

Gods of the copy book headings again.

"Free will" is probably one of the most abused and misunderstood concepts out there.

I don't care what it is; the ten commandments, Aristotle, Aquinas--it is all behavior modification.

bthun said...

Heh...

"I don't care what it is; the ten commandments, Aristotle, Aquinas--it is all behavior modification."

Most anyone who has raised children or even dogs ought to appreciate that.

douglas said...

Or worked to be a better man...